this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
754 points (98.8% liked)

World News

39110 readers
3406 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 82 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Bet they would taste delicious in a stew.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 40 points 4 months ago

It would have a very rich flavor.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (3 children)

See, people keep saying to "eat the rich." I say "beat the rich." Not only is it more satisfying, you can do it repeatedly. You can only eat them once.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Trebuchets are easily constructed from readily available materials. They require no permits to own or operate, and are capable of flinging the fattest of fat cats well over 100 yards.

#YeetTheRich

#PumpkinChuckinUsingFatcats

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

The superior siege weapon.

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

You can eat them after you beat them. The tenderization helps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The post above this one in All for me is the one about a guy inviting women back to his place for delicious stew. Now I want to know what the secret ingredient is.

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

That is exactly why I was thinking about stew

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 65 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But a B-List actor told me it would trickle down half a century ago, so let's give them the benefit of the doubt and maybe we'll catch a dribble

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

And he was right. You get a trickle down. He didn't mention the industrial strength wealth pump going up with the business end stuck in your wallet.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 64 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

The reason billionaires exist is because people like you and me are overcharged for everything we purchase so they can accumulate the surplus.

The reason why we don't do anything about it is because we evaluate that we get good value for our money in most situations.

What is that evaluation based on? Our past experiences...

But the only experiences we have to evaluate what our money is worth is us being charged enough that the rich people at the top accumulate an unreasonable amount of wealth.

We never have an experience where those leeches at the top aren't present to artificially inflate the price of things so we can actually realize how much we're supposed to be able to get for our money!

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 47 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Overcharged and underpaid. They're dipping from both ends.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

We wouldn't be underpaid if things were priced according to their actual cost because the actual cost of things is based on the low salary that people make!

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yet we produce more than ever per hour. So by that account either prices should decrease over time to reflect that, or our wages should be going up. :D

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

Exactly, prices should go down over time as output increases for the same amount of labor!

[–] Frog@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago

And we are paying taxes. The only money they give to the government is directly to the pockets of judges and politicians to make decisions against our best interest and to make them richer.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Temu opened my eyes.

8$ for 4 sponges at Target, no more for me.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (7 children)

I've tried Temu a few times. The quality is such garbage even calling it Chinese crap doesn't do it justice. It's basically from doorstep to landfill.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Yeah I didn't think Chinese knockoffs could get any worse.

Many products on there basically copy photos of a product and replicate how it looks with the cheapest materials possible.

I got a few good deals but understand it's NOT going to be high quality tier stuff

So I buy things I'm willing to just toss if it's no good. I do a refund and they'll tell me to keep it. Then it goes into the trash.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

6 for 75ct. Eurocent, so in USD it's a whopping 81ct. Tax inclusive. Available in both scratchy and gentle.

If supermarkets get away with charging those kinds of prices there's two things to do: a) Raid each and every HQ to see whether you can nail them for collusion, b) price controls.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 4 months ago

Just imagine the housing market...

[–] blazera@lemmy.world 48 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Its a built in feedback loop. Under capitalism, resources are distributed based on capital. But capital is a resource. So its naturally going to concentrate.

We need hard caps on wealth

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Not sure how you achieve that in a world with multiple nations though. Capital is naturally pretty mobile.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

G20 is currently holding negotiations to start imposing a minimum tax on billionaires, guess which country is against that...

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Vatican City? Please, please be Vatican City.

(I know it isn't)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Intrama@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Perhaps my first controversial post here. Hmm. No, I'll be decent. But seriously? Fuck the elites. Fuck them hard.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mle86@feddit.org 19 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I was asking myself, how much money do you need to have, to be in the top 1%?

So for context, according to this article, you are in the top 1% worldwide, if your net worth is above ~872'000.-, that is 19 million US Americans.

With 94'000.- you are in the top 10%

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

What if your net worth is -$50,000? Asking for a friend...

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The top 10% includes the majority of people in the western world. We have been lied to by the select few above us that we have more in common with them than we do with the bottom 90% in the rest of the world.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uis@lemm.ee 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Twitter mob: Protect rich minority at all cost! Feed the billioners!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Nah but it's the poor woman and child fleeing crime & poverty from south of the border who is the problem!!! /s

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (4 children)

what are they going to do with all that money?

hint:

[–] aviation_hydrated@infosec.pub 9 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I think the idea of cryptocurrency is funny, since it's just "I'm not playing your make believe money anymore, so we'll pay our own make believe money since you are obviously rigging the system". Kinda makes sense if adoption keeps up and the planet isn't on fire

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 24 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Thing is, the poor aren’t running bitcoin miner farms. Crypto doesn’t change anything but traceability of the funds, letting the rich get even richer.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 9 points 4 months ago (20 children)

Yeah riding the bubble let a couple of nerds and early investors maybe take advantage of a little economic mobility, like, incidentally. But those days are long passed now. Like you said, it's rigged in favour of entrenched capital, just like everything else now.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] qaz@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

That's a common misconception. Most cryptocurrencies (except XMR) actually increase the traceability of funds compared to traditional payments. Bitcoin really isn't that great for privacy as some crypto enthousiasts say. It's one of those ridicolous "advantages" that prove that most are just hypemen with no idea about how it actually works.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 months ago

Scrooge McDuck ass economy

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

It's never enough.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Makes me hungry.

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 4 points 4 months ago

Tax Reform Act of 1986

The Tax Reform Act of 1986 was the top domestic priority of President Reagan's second term. The act lowered federal income tax rates, decreasing the number of tax brackets and reducing the top tax rate from 50 percent to 28 percent.

Name and shame: Ronald Reagan

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Not good to see but not a giant shock.

load more comments
view more: next ›