Winnipeg

364 readers

5 users here now

Welcome to the Winnipeg Community here on Lemmy.ca!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

troyunrau@lemmy.ca

Working with MPI on a hit and run with evidence (lemmy.ca)

submitted 3 months ago by isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca to c/winnipeg@lemmy.ca

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A family member was recently a victim of a hit and run on her parked car. We know there is evidence that is easy to get, but MPI is refusing to work with us.

A police report was filed, there were eye witnesses, the suspect visited a weed store, got carded there, bought weed, and then performed the hit and run in full view of their camera system with their plate fully visible. The weed store knows who it is.

However, MPI is showing little interest in actually investigating, and this means the victim will have to pay the $200 deductible for something that wasn't their fault and is easily solvable. They keep pressuring MPI at every call that there is evidence and they just have to go get it (as I actually walked into the weed store to ask questions and asked them to keep aside the video evidence, one of their employees was also hit), but so far they have done nothing.

Does anyone know of a process that would push MPI to actually investigate such a thing? TIA

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I thankfully haven't had to deal with MPI for a long time (and truthfully, my personal experiences have been pretty positive), but their website suggests they will have to pay the deductible up front, but should get reimbursed once the issue of who is at fault is sorted out.

Is MPI flat-out refusing to pursue this? If so, what exactly are they saying to justify it?

The answer might be to make themselves as irritating to the adjustors as possible...nothing to lose, really.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

That is correct, the deductible has to be paid upfront and is to be reimbursed if MPI successfully investigates. I'll request more information from my family member, but it sounds to me like MPI was stating that they did not want to investigate.

It does sound like MPI is just trying to cut costs by not investigating, as it's money from the left to the right pocket anyway. Damage is $2500 though, so I'm kinda surprised.

EDIT: Got a response, they just aren't making progress, so I guess I'll just have my family member keep reminding MPI to investigate and they'll hopefully get to it in the end.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah hopefully they can get some traction if they just keep at it. Like I said, I've been pretty fortunate in the past, but I know people who have had some pretty bad experiences.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

My only experience is with private insurance in Quebec. Police goes in, makes a report, gets footage for me, I provide footage to insurer, open and shut within a week. MPI is a whole 'nother beast hahah

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 5 points 3 months ago

Another Hail Mary approach if all else fails could be to shop the story around to local media. If anyone bites, it could certainly lead to a quick resolution.

[–] Gleddified@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

MPI is notoriously bad for this sort of thing. All you can really do is stay on their case. I called them daily for over a month once before they finally got sick of me and did something.

Say what you will about private insurance, at least this sort of thing is handled better.