this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
778 points (97.3% liked)

memes

10671 readers
2760 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 74 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Brought to you by: Project2025

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

yeah not gonna be "old" days for long. they've already started laxing restrictions on several states.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Kentucky just allowed 12 year olds to work for nonprofits 18 hours a week.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 49 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I'm sure through grit and hard work they managed to get rich in later life.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 28 points 5 months ago

the most loyal and obedient slaves are the slaves who think they're free

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 10 points 5 months ago

Some LinkedIn lunatic has probably used this image for their daily motivational post.

[–] catch22@startrek.website 8 points 5 months ago

It's likely their pain ended much sooner

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 36 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The children yearn for the mines.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Mining in particular was the beginning of a lot of unionization movements. People tend to think of hisroiv mining right leaning but they were pretty hard left and pushed hard to worker rights. Mining now is much more right leaning, which is pretty unfortunate.

https://open.spotify.com/track/4abZVfTVIKhVKazN3j6ROU?si=3uUp0ERfQ2eTzXv-oFk-Eg

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Right leaning tends to happen over time as a generation or two forgets about how bad things used to be for them.

[–] force@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

The recent EU elections are a pretty good reminder of this

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

In late USSR miners were one of the most active strata. Pretty left. One can say, the only clearly left of that time's protesters, because, well, around 1988 the general public in USSR was fed up with left ideologies.

See this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Iron_Heel_of_Oligarchy (it's not too shit, from the eyes of Communists trying to find themselves a place in the society that is over them). EDIT: It's an illustration to "fed up", not to late USSR.

[–] cmoney@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Is this back when America was great?

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

These kids are draining the swamp.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago

Using their bare hands as shovels from what it looks like

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Those are some hard eyes. Seven years old going on 40.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Exploitation begins at home!

[–] experbia@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

the ferengi would be so proud of our civilization

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

If they'll buy poison, they'll buy anything.

[–] rsuri@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"The real cause of poverty is too much labor regulation!"

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

"Too much labor regulation" is one of the causes of poverty. Definitely not the main one, though, and there's "too little labor regulation" somewhere as well on that list.

[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 5 points 5 months ago

Now this is pro life!

[–] quinkin@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (4 children)

What has happened to their hands?

[–] hoch@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I actually know a bit of backstory about this photo - it was a series on child labor in the south, and these are photos of oyster shuckers for the Maggioni Canning Co. around 1911.

I'm assuming shucking oysters are rough on the hands, so it could be wounds, but it also looks like crusted-on dirt, so I'm not sure.

Here's another photo where you can see their hands a bit better:

And here's the original untouched photo:

Courtesy of the Library of Congress archives

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I just wanted to add about the stares. Photos back then required the target to be very still ao they are just probably trying their best to keep still.

Most photos of children failed because they moved. These were very still, hence the tension in their eyes, or just a lucky shot. Anyways, photos from way back always look like death for this reason.

[–] veloxization@yiffit.net 2 points 5 months ago

Reminds me of the grim (or beautiful, depending on how you look at it) practice of photographing the deceased, especially children, during the Victorian era. Dressed up and posed, sometimes with living family in the same photo. Part of the reason being the exact fact that they wouldn't move during the shot.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 5 months ago

Thank you for the context and source! Definitely mud and dirt...

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If it isn't AI (geeze have to question everything now), I would hazard a guess that it could be various injuries from textile machines or something.

It could also be just standard "major ouchies incurred as children" but grew back oddly due to lack of access to medical care.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

This image has been around a long time, it’s not AI. The girls are (IIRC) oyster shuckers. So hand injuries are gonna be a thing.

Edit: found information about the girls and the photo here.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago

Enlightening! Thanks for taking the time and sharing what you found! I'll be sure to give that a read. Very much appreciated. :)

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Didn't even notice that at first. All I could see were the thousand-yard stares

[–] TJDetweiler@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Unsure if AI image, or product of horrific work environment....

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

not a.i. ... check the comment from @hoch

[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 4 points 5 months ago

Serves them right for not forming a union.

[–] Jikiya@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Jesus, the state of those dresses. I hope those are "work" clothes, but have a very bad feeling that's their only clothes.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

For late XIX'th century working class those would be their only clothes usually.

EDIT: Putting this in contrast with photos of the inhabitants of the valley my ancestors from paternal side are from (which were mostly all murdered in 1915), I can see from where all the pride about that place came and also envy of the surrounding Muslims and the particular word it was renamed into Turkish (something like "mansions"). In terms of clothes being clean and whole those photos look amazing, and many-story stone houses and such. Just not as amazing when looking at them from XXI-century city perspective.