this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
299 points (98.1% liked)

Science Memes

11004 readers
2148 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] minticecream@lemmy.world 51 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Feels like that square should be a lot smaller

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 55 points 4 months ago

Exponential scales will do that.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 30 points 4 months ago

I found this annotated version.

"Human experience" apparently includes anything from 0.01 seconds to 300 years, or 0.1 mm (diameter of human hair or ovum) to 10,000 km (cca length of Eurasia).

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You can live between 0 and ~1XX years and you can travel between 0 and x km where the largest case for x is probably the people on the ISS.

So rectangle might make sense but obviously there is no chance for someone that dies as a infant to have traveled as far as an adult. Also the people on the ISS probably wont be the oldest people alive. So the edges would have to be cut off diagonally of sorts.

Or is this more like a "This is the scale of things that humans can observe" type of thing.

So we can see close stuff and really far stuff like stars and we can practically observe from milliseconds up to a century.

[–] the_beber@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I think it‘s more about the latter; what humans can comprehend/percieve.

[–] araneae@beehaw.org 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Reminds me of this SCP:

SCP-3125 is adapted for survival in an ideatic ecology considerably more violent and hostile than our own. (Here, "our own" refers to human head space: the set of all ideas which humans have or are biologically capable of having.) Because humans have no natural exposure to ideas as aggressive as SCP-3125, human minds have no protective evolutionary adaptations against it.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

SCP-3125

Oh, the anti memetics division! My favourite.

It's my first day.

[–] araneae@beehaw.org 3 points 4 months ago