this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
114 points (98.3% liked)

Android

17615 readers
209 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 105 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I miss the physical fingerprint reader on the back. Plus you could program it to pull your notification screen down.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 36 points 4 months ago

rear fingerprint reader was peak and I don't know why it went away.

with a rear reader I could grab my phone and it would be unlocked with an index finger before I've even lifted it to my face. it was all one smooth motion.

Now, I have to pull it out of my pocket, orient it correctly so my thumb can hit the correct part of the screen, half the time shake the phone or swipe up to wake up the screen to make the reader work consistently, then hold down my thumb for at least a second longer than I would have to with my rear reader.

dumbest so called "advancement" in years.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Same. It was in the perfect spot, and worked 100% of the time for me.

The in-screen one on my Pixel 6 works maybe 50% of the time, and for whatever reason just hates my right thumb, the one it really needs to be able to read. Even with it saved 5 times.

[–] scrion@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Pixel 6 Pro worked marvelous for me all the time. I have the 8 Pro now, and now the fingerprint reader is a real mess.

But yeah, the reader on the back was perfect.

[–] dandroid@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I sort of had the opposite experience. My pixel 5's fingerprint reader worked about 20% of the time. It was so bad. I've actually had a much better experience with the Pixel 7's in-screen one. It's probably 90% successful. Before my Pixel 5, I had a OnePlus 6, and that one was like 99% successful.

I did prefer the location on the back, though.

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Mine used to work somewhat. Then I got fed up with the errors when unlocking and deleted my finger prints. Now, I get bit with that known bug on Pixel 6 that won't let you register fingerprints (I tried again when I replaced the screen protector - even with no protector). I gave up on that fingerprint reader and 5G on this phone. It still works overall so I refuse to replace it for another year or two.

[–] jtr42@feddit.de 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I bought a Pixel 5 two years ago for exactly that reason (fingerprint on the back) and its small size. I love this phone but honestly the fingerprint reader works 70-80% of the time depending on sweaty hands etc. and by now I wish it was on the front because it often lays on the table and I have to pick it up. It all has its pros and cons and I think an ultrasonic under the display is the best option (right after apples face id).

[–] dumblederp@aussie.zone 3 points 4 months ago

Pixel 5 is perfect. I'd love a updated model that size.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago

Never had issues with the Pixel 2 XL. The reader worked great. Even with stuff on my hands it would still work,eventually (2-3 tries). It picked up great with dry hands.

[–] nukul4r@feddit.de 4 points 4 months ago

I recently switched to the 8a from a Poco F1, and this is the one thing I really miss...

[–] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago (9 children)

I used to work on diesel engines. I'd end up with different looking fingerprints all the time from grease, oil random little cuts, etc. I'd hope this tech is better able to discern fingerprints from noise. It was a little annoying.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 38 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

It might not be. If your fingerprints are physically changing, then an accurate scanner should not recognize a fingerprint that's changed after the fact. If anything you're looking for a less accurate scanner to help with this issue. But a less accurate scanner could let others in your phone too.

A family member is a massage therapist and no fingerprint reader has managed to recognize their fingers. Not even the old capacitive types in the rear. They don't even recognize there's a fingerprint present. It's like tapping with a wiener.

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

1.) Used to be a dishwasher and even the government had a hard time getting my prints.

2.) A wiener (that's attached to a human) can actually be used and make a recognizable print on a fingerprint reader. (Not recommended for daycare workers.)

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 11 points 4 months ago

Someone took their wingerprint

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Now I wanna set up my phone to accept my wiener.

[–] ediculous@feddit.nl 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Don't let your dreams be dreams.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

If my dreams can't be dreams, they can't be anything. Reality doesn't support what matters to me.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The tech has been in Samsung phones for several years, and is good enough that one's fingerprint will read through vinyl gloves if they aren't too scrunched up. It's fast and decent.

Does make me wonder though, it's a Qualcomm tech. Does that mean Google is finally going back to Qualcomm chips? The pixel modems have been trash ever since they left.

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I instinctively tried to open mine with vinyl gloves on once and immediately thought "I'm dumb, gotta take these gloves off first." That was a good shock when it actually worked first try, much confusion...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nathan@ten1919.com 6 points 4 months ago

My fellow diesel tech. Fucking yes this fucking problem right here hahaha. Skin peels a bit, little scratch or cut, got some shit on my hand to dry it out.... And whole new finger print. Add this print, and once it hears it stops working again. Hahahaha fuck my life.

My galaxy s24 has been pretty spot on though, honestly works most of the time unless my hands are very dirty.

[–] Twitches@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I've done so much work with my hands. I thought something was wrong with my phone, my partner walked up finger on phone, opens immediately. Me, half the time I need to use the code because the fingerprint doesn't work.

[–] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. I used to register my off hand, as that was a little less likely to get damaged.

[–] Twitches@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

The problem is I'm prone to accidents so my non dominant and has scars from cutting myself.

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Me too, the random little cuts are by far the worst because it can take weeks until the phone registers your fingerprint again.

[–] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Thank God it allows for more than one finger. I used to start running low on undamaged prints!

[–] madis@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What if you used a part of your palm instead of a finger?

[–] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I solved the problem by getting a better job, but at the time, it wouldn't have helped. Same problem. Swimming in motor oil.

[–] limerod@reddthat.com 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Hmm, for your use case face unlock should be more reliable.

[–] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

If you thought my hands were dirty...

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This thing is so ugly... What's with the GIANT extended camera bar?

[–] Byter@lemmy.one 27 points 4 months ago

At least it's level on a table because of the bar

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I preferred when it was a full squared stripe instead of trying to round the edges. Own it if your going to do that.

(As previously mentioned, it allows them to have some of the best phone cameras and let it sit flat on a table)

[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They rounded it on the wrong axis

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PhotatoMan@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I bought a Samsung S24 recently but sold it because of the terrible ultrasonic fingerprint reader. I guess I have too dry thumbs or something. Using lotion helped for a few hours at a time but I'd rather not use lotion all the time because of my phone. Tried a few tricks like registrering my prints twice etc. but no dice. Meanwhile the old optical reader on my old phone Moto G84 worked perfectly.

So my experience from this is that ultrasonic is not always better.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

The ugly trick is to wipe your thumb on your greasy forehead before using it. Gross, but works.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If the size of the pixel 9 is good I'll upgrade. Other than that I'm good.

[–] aido@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You'll be able to get the "Pro" in both big and small sizes this time

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Comparatively though the pro and regular size of the 7 do not give me hope. The 8 is fine but I haven't been reading up on the 9 rumours yet.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 3 months ago

I don't even like the fingerprint or facescan locks. It wouldn't be that hard for someone to force my phone open while I'm asleep or something. That's why I use a complicated ass pattern and password.

[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

All I know is the one on my 7a is absolute garbage.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί