this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
37 points (100.0% liked)

196

16484 readers
1937 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chemicalprophet@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Masimatutu@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I think you mean !fuckcars@lemmy.world or !fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

(I hope a time will come when you can view all together with !fuckcars or something)

[–] chemicalprophet@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Apparently i need more schooling. And akshuwally I'm not even sure where the group I'm subscribed to is hosted😒. I'll be best next time, thank you Citizen!

[–] Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What a dumb community. I'd be fucked without my car, so you're going to disparage me for using one? Sorry I don't live in fantasy land where public transport is readily available.

[–] Naveen000can@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yes fantasy world of most of the other developed nations. Even some under developed ones

[–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

I'd be fucked without my car

And that's exactly the point of this community. We don't want you to just stop using your car. We want you to have the choice to stop using the car. We hate the fact that car-centered infrastructure led to the point where you can't go anywhere without a car.

This is an issue because first of all, cars are the thing that makes traffic as dangerous as it is for pedestrians, cyclists and other drivers. Secondly they create traffic jams and everyone hates those. Thirdly, something something CO2 something something climate change, you know the jazz. Fourthly, not everyone can afford a car, driving lessons to get a licence, petrol and car insurance.

I could keep going but I hope you see why infrastructure more centered around pedestrians, cyclists and public transport could lead to safer and quicker traffic, cleaner air, lower emissions and more freedom for those who can't afford it.

[–] graveyardchickenhunt@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck cars refers to what they caused with car centric infrastructure. The lobbying that reduced that "fantasy" of public transport to rubble. It's advocating for people centric cities.

At least check what is about before getting offended.

[–] MonsieurArchi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

These days people get offended for even the tiniest thing lol

[–] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck cars is nothing but city dwellers that think their lifestyle is scalable to suburbs or the sticks.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I definitely want a more expansive public transportation system out here in the foot hills. A high-speed rail network to connect us to other parts of the state would be awesome. But it isn't feasible to get rid of all cars completely. A single parent out here can't be expected to make multiple bike trips for the equivalent of one grocery store run, up and down hills to feed multiple children and work a full time job. Some people out here live on roads where cars can barely drive on let alone a bus. edit: typo

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What about the women and children? Did they have to walk?

[–] Rusty@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I transported them. I transported them all. Every single one of them. And not just the men, but the women and the children, too. They’re like passengers, and I transported them like passengers! I LOVE THEM!

bus

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

That was unexpectedly wholesome.

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Yes! Gotta save every drop

[–] GCostanzaStepOnMe@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Up to 1989 british women and children weren't issued a bus loicence

[–] newIdentity@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They aren't allowed to go out

[–] 768@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

1980s ads were stuck in the 1780s, confirmed?

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Can I just say how much I loved Edinburgh for that? I was able to go to pretty much any bus stop, and have one that goes where I needed to go like every ten minutes.

That was quite a while ago though, and I think they wanted to build a tram network, so maybe that's changed

[–] cantsurf@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I agree that personal muscle cars are a "go fuck yourself" to the climate, but look at that bus. It doesn't look fast because it has no reason to be aerodynamic. That thing is either stopped or going like 30 mph a majority of the time. If driving takes you 15 minutes but taking the bus takes you an hour, those with enough money will trade it to get that time back.

That's why good public transit networks using multiple modes are important, as well as reducing car infrastructure to disincentivize driving at the same time

[–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why does it need to be aerodynamic? You know you don't need a Formula 1 shaped car to go faster than 30mph right?

Also the bus pictured is a London city bus. They can't go faster anyways because of all the traffic in London. There's busses designed to go on the highway at least like 60 mph.

[–] Rubanski@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's why the example 15min vs an hour is not working, because both are stuck in traffic

[–] Eleanor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago

It's also the reason why dedicated bus-only lanes are so based. They let the car owners wait in the stupid traffic jam lineup with all the other car owners while the bus chads all fly past them in the bus lane 😎