this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
475 points (88.1% liked)

Comics

5909 readers
227 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 93 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Just keep driving, cheetahs can only maintain that speed for around 30 seconds.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Can't outrun the fine if she can note down your license plate

[–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Plus the whole "running from the police" thing tends to have extra consequences.

... But then again, so does stopping for the police.

[–] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 51 points 4 months ago (3 children)

No shade at furries but this would be a bit funnier if the art was more cartoonish and slightly less horny tbh

[–] sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works 107 points 4 months ago (5 children)

If you saw this and thought it was horny, that might just be a you thing.

[–] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 75 points 4 months ago (3 children)

You expect me to look at a shirtless deer in denim jeans with with a buff chest and choker and a cheetah in a skintight uniform with big tiddies and a fat ass and supple thighs and not become aroused? Sicko

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bongles@lemm.ee 55 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I think they got as far as the cheetah having breasts and have been conditioned by the internet that this means furry. Which is fair.

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 48 points 4 months ago (5 children)

The art style screams furry artist

[–] FlowerTree@pawb.social 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Let's not forget this art is on the top of all time list of the furry_irl subreddit, and I even thought this was posted on a furry_irl communities before looking at this community's name.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

...but that might just be a hilarious coincidence!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 27 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Nah, it's pretty obvious the cheetah is wearing skin tight clothes for asthetic reasons. It might have been habit rather than design, but the artist definitely chose to draw titty-shaped torso rather than cop-shaped torso.

It's not even fucking close either. They drew more titty shape than literal fetish wear shows, much less an actual cop.

[–] flicker@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I dunno. I'm a woman and I didn't notice the skin-tight thing until it was pointed out, but looking back at it, wouldn't any clothes do that at 90 mph?

ACAB but it doesn't look horny to me. She's just woman-shaped to me.

[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 4 points 4 months ago

wouldn't any clothes do that at 90 mph?

Β―\_(ツ)_/Β― Maybe, but it still managed to not look right despite that. It feels more like a failure to communicate speed with the art rather than intending horny anyways. That's part of the problem though. The image looks horny first, and speedy second, or really even third.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

I genuinely cannot believe that people still care about this in the year 2024.

Like, does anyone care if people draw animal people looking cute or sexy or just with human proportions or anything in between? Does it really bother anyone or is it just fun to try to bandwagon something that freaked some housewives out in the 90's because some inside edition episode? It's just drawings of animal characters like have been done for literal millenia. Imagine if some of the more "notorious" disney films came out today, people would lose their minds.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You can't really compare real life people's proportions to a cartoon of an anthropomorphic animal. To me its clear there was no intention for this image to be sexual at all. And believe me, if a furry wanted to draw something suggestive, there would be no discussion as to its horny status. They aren't known for subtlety.

[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 7 points 4 months ago

To me its clear there was no intention for this image to be sexual at all.

You've missed the point; it doesn't matter if the author intended to draw a horny photo. I already agreed on that point in my above comment. The point is that the situation makes no sense for a horny image, but it still looks like one anyways.

You can't really compare real life people's proportions to a cartoon of an anthropomorphic animal.

I can when the animal has bigger tittys than most strippers do.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

To be fair, the tiny waist is pretty accurate to how to the animal looks. Giving the cop big titties and skin-tight uniform might actually be the best way to portray an anthropomorphised cheetah.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 8 points 4 months ago

It's definitely a me thing

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The deer isn't wearing a shirt

[–] problematicPanther@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

He's a redneck deer, as evidenced by the truck, therefore he does not need to wear a shirt while driving,

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)
[–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Yes. Replace the cop's head with a human head, and say she's wearing gloves. Now you have a sexy cop.

I have to agree with OP's assessment.

[–] absentbird@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Now you have a sexy cop.

With a tail

[–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

lol indeed! I thought of adding "remove the tail" after posting, thinking that maybe no one would notice, but I was wrong.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What's weird is how anyone really cares?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] magi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

So zootopia is horny? Or is that just you

[–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (5 children)

The only "sexy" character is a gazelle, in which being sexy is the point - not because it's furry, but because it's part of the story (they could have been humans, robots or books and it would have been the same - a sexy character must be conveyed as sexy somehow.)

But nope, zootopia is not horny. I guess you're referring to Judy, who is a law enforcement officer and she looks fit. She doesn't look sexy, though, or "humanly sexy." That would be... gross, considering it's a children's movie.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Klear@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Did you not notice what's on the deer's head?

Well, those are actually antlers. Fuck.

[–] match@pawb.social 4 points 4 months ago

Well, antlery

For balance: I think it would be funnier if it was more horny. The bulge on the deer was far too small.

[–] WagnasT@lemmy.world 33 points 4 months ago (4 children)
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Yeah but I still wanna pet this one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Klear@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Love the displays in the car shaped like a paw-print.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

ah, yes, species ability memes

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago
[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

For mercury brains like me, What's the joke?

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 38 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

A cheetah can run up to ~~95kph~~ 120kph.

So the joke is the car is still in motion.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 4 months ago

Appreciate it!

[–] LoamImprovement@beehaw.org 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

She is running 95 MPH to keep pace with the speeding vehicle, instead of them both being stationary as the first panel implies.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 4 months ago

Lol I'm dumb. I thought she was standing weird.

[–] x4740N@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is that in freedombux units or metric

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Considering Cheetahs cannot run at 95mph, metric is the safe bet.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί