this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
72 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

3 readers
15 users here now

The latest news and developments on Firefox and Mozilla, a global non-profit that strives to promote openness, innovation and opportunity on the web.

You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Related

Rules

While we are not an official Mozilla community, we have adopted the Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines as far as it can be applied to a bin.

Rules

  1. Always be civil and respectful
    Don't be toxic, hostile, or a troll, especially towards Mozilla employees. This includes gratuitous use of profanity.

  2. Don't be a bigot
    No form of bigotry will be tolerated.

  3. Don't post security compromising suggestions
    If you do, include an obvious and clear warning.

  4. Don't post conspiracy theories
    Especially ones about nefarious intentions or funding. If you're concerned: Ask. Please don’t fuel conspiracy thinking here. Don’t try to spread FUD, especially against reliable privacy-enhancing software. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Show credible sources.

  5. Don't accuse others of shilling
    Send honest concerns to the moderators and/or admins, and we will investigate.

  6. Do not remove your help posts after they receive replies
    Half the point of asking questions in a public sub is so that everyone can benefit from the answers—which is impossible if you go deleting everything behind yourself once you've gotten yours.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Mozilla did their biggest Reddit AMA yet on Thursday, June 13, with eight members of the Firefox leadership team. With 400 total comments on the post, they c...

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 48 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I feel like they would've got more challenging questions had they asked here. They could've even done it on mastodon, with the hashtag #AskMozilla. Instead they chose to prop up the closed web 🥺

[–] RayJW@sh.itjust.works 49 points 5 months ago

Honestly, as much as I would like that as the next guy.. I doubt they would've gotten anywhere close to engagement in the range of 400 comments sadly.

When it comes to reach this is still not the place to be. Now, how meaningful the comments are? That's a different question.

[–] 0x1C3B00DA@fedia.io 10 points 5 months ago

Doing an AMA on mastodon would be a horrible experience for everyone. Others have pointed out the obvious difference in reach, blocks/defederation means some ppl may not even be able to participate, participants might never receive questions, users from different instances wouldn't be able to see sibling comments, etc.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

No they choose to ask they audience. You go where the people are if you want to ask them, you don't make them come to you.

[–] scsi@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago
[–] requiem@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Surprised that nobody asked about their recent purchase of an advertising company.

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Maybe they did, but got moderated.

Or maybe most of the critical community left reddit a while ago, I mean, the top rated question in the AMA asks about changelogs in video format...

[–] requiem@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago
[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The AMA was June 13th, the acquisition news was posted June 16h.

[–] requiem@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Ah. That makes sense!

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Bobby responded that the desktop PWA prototype that Mozilla built a few years ago got “some pretty negative feedback” in user testing and they didn’t have the bandwidth to take another crack at it.

I love how much people forget about this. PWAs were not liked when they came out. And that's putting it very very mildly.

And morover, at the time, people in general did not like PWAs as a concept. Independent of the browser. It's a bit funny when nowadays people always ask for PWA support, considering it was once yelled at until it was axed, and the whole concept ridiculed.

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 7 points 5 months ago

I still don't like it.

But it doesn't change the fact that some big players insist on PWAs instead of standalone Electron/whatever wrappers if you want anything close to a native desktop experience instead of a browser tab.

[–] 0x1C3B00DA@fedia.io 3 points 5 months ago

PWAs were not liked when they came out.

By some ppl. There were also ppl who did like them. As soon as the desktop support was axed, fans of the feature started complaining immediately.

at the time, people in general did not like PWAs as a concept. Independent of the browser

Again, I think this is a sampling issue, because my experience was the complete opposite.

And one of the key parts of PWA features was the "Progressive" part. The site works without those features and you don't have to use them so removing the support never made much sense to me.

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 3 points 5 months ago

And as for taking another crack at it, this time hopefully in a way that won't confuse non-users, here's some interesting followup looking for input: https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/how-can-firefox-create-the-best-support-for-web-apps-on-the/m-p/60561