this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
75 points (97.5% liked)

Open Source

30349 readers
2225 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If I decide to self-publish a book what happens to the copyright? Is there a way to prevent others from claiming copyrights for a book published autonomously? Are there OS licenses specifically tuned for books?

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] taanegl@beehaw.org 56 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When it comes to creative work, Creative Commons is the way to go. I know a guy who exclusively releases music under the Creative Commons license.

Here's a "Chooser" wizard, that asks you some questions and then suggests a suitable CC license for you.

[–] Shimon@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fun fact KGWZ released one of their albums completly free (i guess public domain) and encourage you to play with it as much as you want :)

https://kinggizzardandthelizardwizard.com/polygondwanaland

[–] taanegl@beehaw.org 8 points 2 months ago

Here's a careful reminder that "public domain" is not a worldwide thing ^^; in fact, very few countries have a public domain.

In some cases, if you try to publish something as "public domain" from a certain country, it is invalid - because their judiciary does not define public domain as anything.

It maybe considered public domain, until you die and someone wants that copyright, in which case the family takes precedent over the estate - full stop.

There's a difference between countries that have common law (US and UK) and those that have civil law (the Nordics), so yeah.

But CC is valid license pretty much everywhere, with a few exceptions.

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/cclicenses/

You probably want the SA (share-alike) or NC-SA (non-commercial share-alike) but take a look and decide what suits you best.

From https://creativecommons.org/faq/#do-i-have-to-provide-my-name-can-i-ask-that-my-name-be-removed :

Do I have to provide my name? Can I ask that my name be removed?

As a licensor, you may choose to receive under any name that you wish, such as a pseudonym or pen name, or you may choose not to be credited by name at all, and to publish anonymously. You do not have to be credited under your legal name. Most jurisdictions permit this, but you should check to be sure this is valid in your jurisdiction.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

or CC BY-NC-SA (the non-commercial-use-only one)

[–] s12@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 months ago

RMS’s biography “Free as in Freedom” seems to be under the GNU Free Documentation License, incase that’s anything to go by.

[–] 10_0@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Personally I would keep it proprietary unit I've made all the money I can they change it to an open license like Creative Commons Share-A-like

[–] Linus_Torvalds@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I hope that you will never publish a book.

[–] 10_0@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 months ago