this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
95 points (97.0% liked)

World News

32327 readers
606 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago

US Olympics is probably being overly cautious ever since Taliyah Brooks collapsed from exhaustion when they refused to delay a US Olympic trials a couple years back due to extreme heat.

Taliyah was on pace to make it to the Olympics until that happened.

[–] BurningRiver@beehaw.org 23 points 5 months ago

How much concrete did they pour to build the infrastructure needed to host the games? I’d really like an analysis of that and the carbon footprint left behind by a few dozen AC units over a couple weeks.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


EUGENE, Ore. (AP) — The U.S. Olympic team is one of a handful that will supply air conditioners for their athletes at the Paris Games in a move that undercuts organizers’ plans to cut carbon emissions.

U.S. Olympic and Paralympic CEO Sarah Hirshland said Friday that while the U.S. team appreciates efforts aimed at sustainability, the federation would be supplying AC units for what is typically the largest contingent of athletes at the Summer Games.

“As you can imagine, this is a period of time in which consistency and predictability is critical for Team USA’s performance,” Hirshland said.

The Washington Post reported earlier this month that Germany, Australia, Italy, Canada and Britain were among the other countries with plans to bring air conditioners to France.

According to the International Energy Agency, fewer than 1 in 10 households in Europe has air conditioning, and the numbers in Paris are lower than that.

“It’s a high-performance environment,” Australian Olympic Committee spokesman Strath Gordon explained to The Post.


The original article contains 367 words, the summary contains 165 words. Saved 55%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I never thought heat would be an issue in Île-de-France

[–] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's not. Americans just can't live without AC.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

That is correct. We cannot.

[–] un_aristocrate@jlai.lu 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How will they install ac units ?

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 10 points 5 months ago

Probably using portable ones where you put the pipe out of the window and seal around it.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works -5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The organisers should just cut their power supply. Or disqualify the team for trying to gain an unfair advantage.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How is it unfair? Couldn't any team do the same thing?

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

ACs are not being provided to reduce emissions. Most teams seem to be respecting this decision.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Lol that's bullshit, someone fucked up to save a dime and they're trying spin it

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago

First of all, [citation needed]. Second, even if it is, a good message is being sent.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No, it's just posturing. The emissions from AC at the Olympic Village would have zero impact on climate change. This is just green washing for public perception points.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The emissions saved from removing a few hundred ACs are negligible. But the message it sends to the millions watching the Olympics is significant. Which, again, is why I am hoping there will be at least some symbolic action against rule-breakers - it will start a conversation about the need to regulate / ban ACs.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

As far as I can tell, there is no rule to break here.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If living areas of the Olympics are getting hot enough that AC gives an advantage. They're too damn hot, and that's on France...

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 months ago

ACs are not being provided to reduce emissions. Everyone is being asked to accept an equal handicap, so that the world does not become even hotter in the coming years. It's largely symbolic, I agree, but I suppose kicking out a team that prioritises its medal tally over the climate crisis would send an even stronger signal.