this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
196 points (94.1% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2267 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Russian president delivered the warning after Seoul announced it would consider arming Kyiv.

Russian President Vladimir Putin Thursday warned South Korea that sending lethal weapons to Ukraine would be a “big mistake.”

His comments come after Seoul announced it would consider arming Ukraine in response to Russia and North Korea signing a mutual defense pact on Wednesday.

“If South Korea supplies weapons to Ukraine, it will not like the answer. I hope they won’t do it, it would be a big mistake,” Putin said at a press conference in Vietnam, where he is conducting a two-day state visit aimed at deepening strategic cooperation.

top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 145 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Putin pledged military aid to South Korea's greatest enemy, but then throws a hissy fit when South Korea considers military aid fir Ukraine in response. I'm sick of seeing the world being run by idiotic toddlers.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 47 points 4 months ago

Like most tyrants, they purge critical minds and leave yes men. It increasingly skews their perception of reality and leaves them to think they're far smarter than they really are. Putin is so fucked lol.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 84 points 4 months ago

Yeah huge mistake, just look at what's happened to all the other countries that did!

/s

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 75 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes, South Korea wouldn:t want to ruin their friendship with their neighbors in the North. You know the ones always sending them gifts

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ballons full of shit a fair exchange to unsolicited K-Pop tbh

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago

It's not. You don't have to play the K-Pop USB sticks, but you sure as hell can't avoid smelling the shit NK drops on your house.

[–] Obonga@feddit.de 68 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

At this point he should just shut up. If Putins tells someone to not do something it is very likely that it is the exact thing they ought to do.

[–] mindlight@lemm.ee 44 points 4 months ago

Putin warns...zzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZ

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 40 points 4 months ago

Sort of like how it would be a big mistake if NATO armed them.

And then NATO armed them.

[–] kwomp2@sh.itjust.works 40 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh god please no, please don't escalate this war by adding the killer kind of weapons to it

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

All weapons are killer, just varying levels.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago

Bark bark bark

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If South Korea does this, he'll tell his fat buddy Kim to send more shit balloons over the border.

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Eww, shit balloons.

[–] HerrVorragend@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

South Korea will now only send weapons that maim and terrify.

[–] sebsch@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

When Putin says it will be a mistake, it's probably a very good idea 💡

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

It would be a mistake to send this amount of material. We should double the shipment. Hell, triple it.

[–] praise_idleness@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We'll send them bitchin' weapons then.

[–] ax_xa@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Don’t make us send the gnarly weapons!

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Or the weapons of Ultraviolence.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That guy is still alive? Do I have to go there my self and build a 5 story building with precarious under engineered balconies?

[–] Axeman666@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Seriously dude, it seems no one in Russia has any balls. I was told Russia was a country in despair. Where are all the suicidal folk with a chip on their shoulder?

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

This is how dictators exist. The valuables they are stealing from their country get reinvested not just to their personal enrichment but also enriching those people key to keeping them in power, from bodyguard to security departments that spend most of their time monitoring citizens for wrong think.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

The amount of times I've seen the headline "Putin tells [/Insert_Country] that [/Insert_UkraineAid] would be a 'big mistake'"...

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'm sure China would be thrilled if Russia started WWIII on their border.
But let's be honest though, world war III started 3 years ago and as of right now there are currently 9 more active conflicts going on worldwide than the peak of world war II, but no one is going to call it a world war until the superpowers are in direct conflict with each other.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 27 points 4 months ago

World wars don't start until the superpowers are in direct conflict. That's what defines a "World War". There are always multiple conflicts going on around the globe.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

as of right now there are currently 9 more active conflicts going on worldwide than the peak of world war II

Are you really putting the regional conflicts occuring today in the same category as World War II, where over 70,000,000 people were killed? "World War III started 3 years ago" is the stuff of a conspiracist's fever dream and is not based in any objective reality

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

On the other hand ww2 arguably started with Japan's invasion of China in 1937. So it is possible that the Ukraine conflict is the opening stages of ww3, but say it definitely is the start of ww3 is way overstating it.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The Ukraine invasion is totally different though, the international community has already been involved for years and the front lines are more or less static at this point. What Japan did in China...no one stopped them and they kept going all over the Pacific. Another difference was Japan and Germany being formidable powers, Russia is nothing of the sort today, and China is smart enough to stay away

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Agreed, WW2 scale became crazy because Japan and Germany were just allowed to conquer so much so fast before a meaningful response. Russia is being held to a much tighter theater from the onset.

[–] Archelon@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I agree that seeing the current regional conflicts as the opening shots of WWIII is a bit hyperbolic, but I also think a much better comparison is the Balkan Wars of 1912-13 and the related July Crisis considering how the major powers are being lead through proxy conflicts into “a series of interrelated diplomatic and military escalations.”

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

“World War III started 3 years ago” is the stuff of a conspiracist’s fever dream and is not based in any objective reality

I would have said that too...until I watched the Ryan McBeth video about it. I'm still not sure he's correct but he does make a convincing argument that were not only in it but that it started in 2014.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

At that point you're kind of arguing that there was only one World War with a 20-year armistice. I can see what they mean, and certainly tensions are escalating, but we've still made a concerted effort to not drag more people in while limiting the expansion of Russia's territory.

In 5 or 10 years we will be talking about how we avoided the Russia-Ukraine conflict expanding into another world war or we will be talking about how these were the first stages of that conflict.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I was just about to link that video. He does put forward a convincing thesis in fairness to him.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

His argument doesn't make it sound at all like WW II though, there are way more parallels with the Cold War

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

And Putin knows everything there is about big mistakes

[–] arran4@aussie.zone 9 points 4 months ago

That's a ... really well defined threat...

[–] alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

Now now you old fart, let's get you back to bed

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

O no! Watch out y'all! Putin is warning people again! He might invade a country for no reason and start commiting war crimes and genocide... ... ... ...

Wait...

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Big Smoke, you make big mistake.