this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

19967 readers
66 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ulu_mulu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Valve then forwarded us the statement from Nintendo's lawyers, and told us that we had to come to an agreement with Nintendo in order to release on Steam.

We all know Nintendo is a bitch and there's nothing illegal in emulators, but Valve's stance looks reasonable to me, it would be serious damage to Steam if they were involved in ~~legal~~ litigation.

[–] hardypart@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, I can understand that they don't want to fight someone else's fight.

[–] peter@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We have a very strong argument that Dolphin is not primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing protection. Dolphin is designed to recreate the GameCube and Wii hardware as software, and to provide the means for a user to interact with this emulated environment. Only an incredibly tiny portion of our code is actually related to circumvention.

That doesn't sound like a strong argument to me. I'm a supporter of emulation but I think that the amount of code involved in making it happen doesn't stop it from being the primary purpose.

[–] green_pyroxene@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

what's being circumvented here is the encryption of Wii games. the primary purpose of Dolphin is not to decrypt Wii games, it is to emulate them (in other words, make them interoperable with PC hardware, as pointed out later). the circumvention of encryption is a necessary part of emulation, but it's not the primary purpose.