this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
58 points (100.0% liked)

Academia

771 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 21 points 5 months ago

“Free speech wins again!” Jordan posted on X on Friday, calling the Observatory part of a “censorship regime.”

Politician bullies an independent academic research team into silence and crows about how that's a win for free speech. Jesus fucking christ.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Two ongoing lawsuits and two congressional inquiries into the Observatory have cost Stanford millions of dollars in legal fees, one of the people told The Washington Post. Students and scholars affiliated with the program say they have been worn down by online attacks and harassment amid the heated political climate for misinformation research, as legislators threaten to cut federal funding to universities studying propaganda.

Take a guess which legislators have a problem with debunking misinformation.

The study of misinformation has become increasingly controversial, and Stamos, DiResta and Starbird have been besieged by lawsuits, document requests and threats of physical harm. Leading the charge has been Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), whose House subcommittee alleges that the Observatory improperly worked with federal officials and social media companies to violate the free-speech rights of conservatives.

“Free speech wins again!” Jordan posted on X on Friday, calling the Observatory part of a “censorship regime.”

Donald Trump adviser Stephen Miller’s law firm filed a First Amendment lawsuit in May 2023 against the Observatory, Stamos, DiResta and others; it is still pending.

They believe free speech means freedom to lie without challenge.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Weird how the free speech stops when you reply with "bullshit".