this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
68 points (95.9% liked)

World News

32079 readers
772 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder when they'll reach peak coal for their electricity production.

[–] lloydsmart@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, this is vitally important. Switching from petrol to EVs will be a net negative for the environment if all that energy comes from burning coal.

They have to clean up their grid, which unfortunately isn't happening at the moment. They're building new coal plants.

[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

What….. China is literally by far the biggest installer of renewable energy in the world. Like orders of magnitude ahead of Europe and the US. It’s not even close.

[–] specialdealer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s still a significant net gain because of the energy conversion efficiency of both EVs and large scale power generation. It also reduces pollution in densely populated areas which improves citizen health.

Still, they should clean their grid ASAP, but they are deploying solar faster than anyone else and it’s not close.

[–] lloydsmart@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're also deploying coal faster than anyone else.

I've heard this argument before about the efficiency of burning centrally, usually in a European context to defend running EVs on a grid powered mostly by natural gas, but not for coal.

Now I'm genuinely curious whether efficiently burning coal to power EVs is less bad for the environment than burning petrol in ICE cars. Is there any research on that?

I agree that ultimately EVs are the future, and I do drive one myself and strive to charge it on renewables whenever possible. However, in places with dirtier grids I'm not sure they're a great idea.

[–] Magrath@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Well it's still a step in the right in my opinion. It's one less source of greenhouses gases. It's one less industry that needs to be cleaned up.

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good to hear. This is not just his news for the environment but politically as well. The sooner the petro-states fade into geopolitical oblivion, the better for all of us.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's what I never understood about climate change denialists. If they were arguing in good faith, there's still a million reasons besides climate change to get off fossil fuels, but somehow they never see that (obviously because they're shills for fossil fuel companies,).

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

They're not arguing in good faith. The whole climate change denialism thing has always been a creation of Big Oil.