this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024
246 points (98.8% liked)

News

23284 readers
3457 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former Los Angeles police detective Mark Fuhrman who was convicted of lying on the witness stand in the O.J. Simpson trial three decades ago, is now barred from law enforcement under a California police reform law meant to strip the badges of police officers who act criminally or with bias.

Fuhrman, who is white, was one of the first two police detectives sent to investigate the 1994 killings of Simpson’s ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ronald Goldman in Los Angeles. The slayings and Simpson’s trial exposed divisions on race and policing in America.

Fuhrman reported finding a bloody glove at Simpson’s home but his credibility came under withering attack during the trial as the defense raised the prospect of racial bias.

Under cross-examination, Fuhrman testified that he had never made anti-Black racial slurs over the previous 10 years, but a recording made by an aspiring screenwriter showed he had done so repeatedly.

Fuhrman retired from the LAPD after Simpson’s 1995 acquittal and at age 72 his return was doubtful. The decertification was likely meant to make clear that California will not tolerate such officers.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 90 points 5 months ago

Let that be a lesson to all those shitty police officers that you will be punished for your unethical behavior with not being able to be a police officer anymore... 30 years after you retire.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 55 points 5 months ago

a California police reform law meant to strip the badges of police officers who act criminally or with bias.

Only took 30 years to do something most people probably assumed was already a law.

[–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 34 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if it would take 30 years to punish me for lying on the stand.

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 24 points 5 months ago

That depends.. are you a cop or rich?

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

On the one hand it’s a good law and I understand why the reporter would want a comment from Fuhrman.

On the other hand that was 30 years ago and he’s been retired for a long time and clearly DGAF.

Fuhrman declined to comment Friday when reached by phone. “That was 30 years ago. You guys are really up to speed,” he told an Associated Press reporter. When told that The San Francisco Chronicle had reported that his decertification became formal in May, he replied “good for them, have a nice day,” before hanging up.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Better late than never I guess.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

California law bars ex-LAPD officer Mark Fuhrman, who lied at OJ Simpson trial, from policing

That’s a very specific law.

[–] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 25 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Roughly 100 officers have been decertified since 2023.

The article is just framing this whole thing bizarrely so that OJ Simpson is in the headline to get more clicks. Looks like with the new law they're just going through and decertifying any police officer, past or present, that meets certain criteria. He hasn't been a police officer since 1995. This law was passed in 2021.

[–] NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. Here's a relevant snippet from the article:

The California decertification law was passed in 2021 in the wake of the 2020 police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis and took effect in 2023. The law came 18 years after lawmakers stripped that power from a state police standards commission. That left it to local agencies to decide if officers should be fired, but critics said they could often simply get a job in a different department.

This is big, although I wonder how difficult it is for an officer to move to a different state and get a job even if they were decertified by this law.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

At least moving to a different state is a high enough barrier that some bad dudes will end up taking new jobs where there is less temptation to ruin lives.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Oh, that makes more sense.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In other news, Mussolini is prevented from holding office again.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

Ladies and Gentlemen, we got him.

[–] charade_you_are@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Better late than never I guess?

[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 3 points 5 months ago

It's good to see that nature is finally healing

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Holding Police Officers, the same ones who Murder Children or Watch Children get Gunned down in School, accountable is COMMUNISM!