this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
866 points (85.8% liked)

Firefox

17910 readers
78 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 151 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Brave Software, the company behind the browser of the same name, was founded by Brendan Eich. He's best known as the creator of JavaScript from his days at Netscape Communications

Say no more fam.

[–] nxfsi@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

Truly no atonement can be sufficient for a sin that grave

[–] hai@lemmy.ml 100 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (18 children)

TL;DR: The article claims that the Brave web browser is bad and should not be used.

The author points out that Brendan Eich, the creator of JavaScript, co-founder (and ex-CEO) of Mozilla, and founder of Brave, donated 1,000 USD in support of a proposition to ban same-sex marriage. Along with making the claim that Brave's goal is not to act as an ad-blocker, but instead to build and grow their own advertisement network, and he also believes that the network has several flaws:

  • Brave Ads paysout in a form of cryptocurrency, called BAT (🦇).
  • As BAT is a cryptocurrency there is high volatility.
  • BAT can not be redeemed for fiat ("actual") money directly from within the Brave Wallet.
  • The author also believes that "it [the network] has largely failed" but that it "has generated a lot of revenue for Brave," via the ICO (Initial Coin Offering; IPO for crypto).

In addition to these key points the author also:

  • Claims that Brave prompted FTX, before the scandal.
  • Cites the The Brave Marketer Podcast where ex-CMO of Crypto.com Steven Kalifowitz shares an ambitious goal of being a "'brand like Coke and Netflix.'" The author then mentions that:
    • In 2023 there was a report from The Financial Times that Crypto.com traded against their customers.
    • In 2022 the company try to hide the severity of its layoffs.
  • Mentions Brave's integration with Gemini, and how the crypto exchange is under investigation for lying about FDIC insurance.
  • Mentions a partnership with the the 3XP Web3 Gaming Expo where they sponsored the Esports Arena and rewarded contestants with the BAT token.
  • Claims that Brave added affiliate/referral codes to URLs, such as "binance.us."

Finally, the author lists Firefox and Vivaldi as alternatives to Brave, and ends the article with "Brave Browser is irredeemable, and you should not use it under any circumstances."

I am human, please let me know if I've made a mistake.

Edit: Fixed bat emoji and typo.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As BAT is a cryptocurrency there is high volatilability (I don’t know if I spelled that right :/ ).

Volatility :-)

[–] zerohash@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But Volatilability sounds cool

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Lafuma300@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago (39 children)

No. Couldn't care less what the founder did or didn't do. We need as many non-Google browsers as possible. The problem with Brave is that it is a chromium browser.

[–] shotgun_crab@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd say being chromium makes it a Google browser...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)
[–] jabberati@social.anoxinon.de 67 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

@whou Don't forget the time they made it possible to 'donate' to creators, but when creators weren't signed up with their program #Brave would just keep the donation. So users would think they have donated for example to Tom Scott, but in reality he never received anything. Overall just a scummy company.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

[Eich] donated $1,000 in support of California's Proposition 8 in 2008, which was a proposed amendment to California's state constitution to ban same-sex marriage.

Even though I do not agree at all with the donation and support - out of the things that influence me into choosing a browser, 15 year-old private donations of appointed CEOs is pretty low on that list.

And the whole BAT thing is opt-in and they're very transparent about it. I don't get why people get so triggered when the C word - crypto - is involved.

[–] Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I think the only relevant criticism I see is adding affiliate codes to urls (until they were caught).

The author also forgot the polemic of adding twitter and facebook trackers to the whitelist, and impersonating people in their ads. There are some interesting criticisms against brave, I don't understand why their detractors are obsessed with the CEO and crypto.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

But the data collection sounds like it's counter to its supposed goals. Multiple campaigns have been discussed that just make it believe they don't actually care about privacy considering all the ways they keep trying to do stuff is counter to that. Why stay? Tor Browser is available. Hell, Firefox itself is already able to take you pretty far and extensions can do the rest.

Why make the sacrifice of your personal data? Like, how many attempts at collecting personal data do you need to have occur before you realize it's always been their goal?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The fact is i don't care about these things. All it matters is that Brave uses Chromium, therefore I'll never touch it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] heavyboots@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I mean… I've been using Firefox since Google silo'd all log-ins together.

On the other hand, search.brave.com is freaking incredible. It's so much better than Google, Bing or DDG at this point, it's shocking. I switched a couple weeks ago and it's surreal to see so many usable, useful results on the first page again.

[–] McBain@feddit.ch 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Tried it for a couple of weeks and went back to DDG. It's way better for programming and other geekie stuff imo.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ytg@feddit.ch 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fine, but, like, don't recommend Vivaldi. Also, if you disable the Brave ads, you're not really supporting them, while still getting the benefits.

— Sent from Librewolf

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Echo71Niner@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What a shitty fucking article.

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Why is it shitty? TBH my biggest problem with Brave is their push for the crypto ad tokens. Any company pushing crypto shit instantly gets put on my shit list.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xaxl@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

You shouldn't use Brave simply because it's heavily infected with crypto shit and tries to monitorize your web browsing time by default. Not everything you do has to be a side hustle.

Sure you can "switch it off" but then why not use something else in the first place that's focus isn't trying to make money out of you. If Brave ever gained any decent market share the web would be an even shitter place than what Google is suggesting at the moment.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well reading this had the opposite effect than intended. Now i just hate the author

[–] nottheengineer@feddit.de 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup, half of it is just "I don't like this person, so no one should use anything they have anything to do with".

The points about the browser itself are clearly just afterthoughts.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I mean, regardless of whether it sounds like afterthoughts, it kind of sounds like the ulterior motive for Brave is entirely counter to its purported intent. Why ignore it just because of something unrelated? Sounds like the exact same issue people complain about the author.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Never used it to begin with.

[–] hal_5700X@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Dude, this is a Firefox. Why tell us not use something what...95% of people here are not using in the first place?

EDIT: The crypto stuff is opt-in. You don’t have to use Brave Shields (in browser ad blocker). It can be turned off. Now you can use uBlock Origin or another ad blocker.

About the CEO, I can’t see nothing about his beliefs reflecting in his work. Looks like he kept them separated. I’m not for said beliefs.

EDIT 2: Also Brendan Eich is a co-founder of Mozilla. So if you're not going to use Brave because of him. How can you use Firefox?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I made the switch last month from Brave for years, back to firefox. Brave is easy more effective at blocking tablets and ads, even with ublock/adblock. You can install it and just start using a cleaner web, and it's really easy to customize gow much of an effect the sanitization is. I defended a lot of what Brave did in the early days, because what I was hearing from developers is that they were trying to monetize it in anyway possible that maintained the privacy of the user, and I understand that ethos.

It's the years and years of missteps that finally got to me. I started to feel like I had to keep up on what they were doing to make sure nothing slipped through, and that's not trust.

I still think they have the best ad blocking tech, it beats my pihole, it beats Firefox with extensions. It's fast, and it displays websites reliably.

But, we do need to consider the roads we pave and the tools we use. Brenden Eich has not apologized for his donation, but at the time he did write a blog post about supporting LGBT initiatives at Mozilla and he had support from people that he worked with. He resigned because at the time there was nothing you could do to assuage an internet hate mob but resign. There is information around stating that three board members left because of his appointment, but only one actually said that,

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stop using it with honey mustard sauce! Stop using it with tangy sweet and sour sauce! Stop eating the new fiesta Brave salad! Stop enjoying Brave on the patio, in the car, or on the boat... wherever good times are had!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

As if people really using a browser with a built-in advertising network.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] PatFussy@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

These are pretty unconvincing reasons to tell people to stop using brave...

load more comments
view more: next ›