this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
59 points (100.0% liked)

Mastodon

5284 readers
1 users here now

Decentralised and open source social network.

https://joinmastodon.org/

GitHub

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FarraigePlaisteach@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be super clear — I'm 100% not saying it is fraudulent. This could be as simple as “Some work was intended to be done, it wasn't, other work was done instead, and the expense description was not updated”.

This is common in small projects, I would say.

[–] NOSin@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The answers and reactions of those admins is incredibly fishy tho, and I don't really see a good ending to all that with what's been documented.

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sad to see such a good project die.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There are a few other good options, I guess the good bits of the code can be pulled over?

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

On mobile Tusky is basically the gold standard for Mastodon clients. There are some other clients, but I didn't fine one as good as Tusky. I guess I'll switch to the Elk PWA since I already use Elk on desktop - but this depends on an official Reply from Tusky regarding the blog post.

[–] coffee_poops@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

You clearly haven't used Megalodon. Better UX all around.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ah ok yea I haven't used it in a while, partially because I barely used Mastodon (never used twitter). I've been using the official Mastodon app when I needed to.

I'll look more into it :)

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's alpha software but works very well. I did not encounter any issues.

The official Mastodon app to me feels clumsy and outdated. Not a good experience at all for me. I can't pinpoint it, though. Just my personal opinion.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Ah ok I see

I heard they updated it recently (so if you haven't tried it in a bit you could), but again I'm going off the experience of other people. I didn't use it enough to get a feel from it.

[–] moitoi@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Elk is great on desktop and especially to write an answer.

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Jep. I completely switched to Elk since my comment. Not the PWA, though.

[–] SatyrSack@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Husky is a fork of Tusky. Probably better than just adding Tusky features to existing clients.

[–] tinsuke@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] NOSin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

OK, we're way past fishy now.

[–] eendjes@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’d like to hear the other side too, but it’s hard to imagine there’s no foul play at all.

[–] tinsuke@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Let's see, they have mentioned they'll come with an answer: https://birb.site/@charlag/110967792971490761

Quite sad, because Nik was the most active developer on the project. All my (small) contributions were reviewed by him: https://github.com/tuskyapp/Tusky/pulls?q=is%3Apr+author%3Atinsuke

[–] gabe 3 points 1 year ago

Man this makes me so sad