this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38861 readers
2178 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Leading energy companies are intent on pushing the world in the opposite direction, expanding fossil fuel production and insisting that there is no alternative. It is evidence that they are motivated not by record warming, but by record profits, experts say.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Remember, folks, it’s only “socialism” when we talk about sharing profits among the people. Sharing blame and responsibility is perfectly okay!

[–] Opafi@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

expanding fossil fuel production and insisting that there is no alternative.

No alternative? No fucking alternative? Like... We're talking about extinction level scenarios and they're like "yeah, okay, we're all going to die, but I don't think your suggested alternatives to that are viable"

Like, don't they see that their profits ultimately depend on humanity existing to consume their products? What the fuck is wrong with them? Who do they think will bail them out when the planet is too fucking hot to live on?

[–] Kosta554@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who could’ve seen this coming! /s

[–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I wonder if they will see me coming.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“They (Oil companies) have left no doubt that their pledges were deployed for cynical political purposes, only to be ditched when they no longer suited the industry’s strategic position,”

That strategic position was to avoid being governed, said Timmons Roberts, professor of environment and sociology at Brown University.

“The climate commitments … were almost certainly made to give the impression that they don’t need to be regulated because their voluntary pledges are adequate,”

You know, I'm kinda tired of every article about oil companies being either something straight out of police reports or just being the same "No shit, Sherlock" about them being evil, lying, manipulative and greedy assholes. I'd love to see them being fined some 50 billion dollars, but I feel they'd manage to overturn that anyway. Justice and police exist to protect property.

[–] toasteecup@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

justice and police exist to protect the rich

Ftfy

[–] Feirdro@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

media, justice and police exist to protect the rich

FTFTFY

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I honestly do not think that it is oil companies that should fight climate change. They should provide oil derived product as required by economy. It is OUR COLLECTIVE RESPONSIBILITY to act. Through individual choices, through government incentives, through carbon taxes and so on. To expect that all oil companies together will act against their profits and interests is naive.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Expecting oil companies to solve climate change is like expecting car companies to solve traffic jams.

It's naive thinking.

Carbon taxes and cheap nuclear power. We have had the two main required policy tools and technology since the 1980s to solve climate change.

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Those two things are great solutions for the billionaires but absolutely suck for everyone else, no wonder you see them pushed so much.

The first is a tax which will strongly affect the poor while allowing the rich to continue as normal, the second allows the rich to control power generation and essentially continue the monopoly rather than move towards decentralised sources which can be community run.

We need to switch from a greed based system which obsesses over displays of wealth and move to a more ecologically sound way of existence, but people can't even consider taking the slightest responsibility for their lifestyle