You know, I never thought about the fact that quidditch, a game that J.K. Rowling came up with herself is non-gendered. Yet she goes onto social media and screams about how we can't let trans women compete against the pure and innocent cis girls. Fuck off Rowling.
this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
518 points (91.4% liked)
Comics
5885 readers
119 users here now
This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.
Rules:
1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules
2- Be civil.
3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.
4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine π΅πΈ . Zionists will be banned on sight.
5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.
Guidelines:
- If possible, give us your sources.
- If possible, credit creators of each comics in the title or body of your post. If you are the creator, please credit yourself. A simple β- Meβ would suffice.
- In general terms, write in body of your post as much information as possible (dates, creators, editors, links).
- If you found the image on the web, it is encouraged to put the direct link to the image in the βLinkβ field when creating a post, instead of uploading the image to Lemmy. Direct links usually end in .jpg, .png, etc.
- One post by topic.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
As I understand, she's a trans-excluding radical feminist, so within her world view that is probably coherent:
- Ideally, sports should be non-gendered, like quidditch, because everyone has equal chances anyways.
- Where there's biological differences or social reasons why women have no chance when competing with men, a women's league should exist, to give women an opportunity for publicity, prizes etc..
Like, the above makes sense, as much as it ever will do. And factually, trans people do blur the line here and point out the fault in this arbitrary system. I can understand having a brainfart, that if only those trans people wouldn't exist, we wouldn't have that concept challenged.
But trans people do exist and trans people are fucking fantastic for feminism literally everywhere else. Blurring those lines means that all those systems where cis men are privileged get put into question just as much. It's so stupid to get hung up on sports and gendered bathrooms.
The reason people are getting stuck up on sports and gendered bathrooms is that it's a wedge issue that can be weaponized to keep people fighting and distracted by culture war nonsense so the focus isn't on the building of the Orange Reich, a dozen companies contributing to almost all the climate change, and our economic system working to keep us enslaved.
I think the whole hypocrisy becomes blatantly apparent, when we start talking about transmen. An US veteran transmen made a very nice post i saw many years on reddit. He has a mighty beard and asked, if anyone thinks women feel safer if he is obliged to use their bathroom.
A trans boy beat up a bunch of girls and felt really bad about it. He wants to compete in the boys' wrestling league, but the transphobes won't let him because he has a vagina.
The future transphobes want is a man in the girls bathroom and a man beating up your daughters.
There's a reason terf stands for trans exclusionary.
They don't really believe in some bullshit biological essentialism where trans men and cis women are categorised together. They just want all trans people gone. Excluded from society.
Biological essentialism is just an excuse to be dicks to trans people.
Yep. Rowling kept up a facade for a while, but even she admits now that she doesn't even believe trans people really exist. They thing we are confused, malicious, or deluded.
Hard agree with this. Its just rage bait distractions.
Yeah it's absolutely true that there is nuance here and it's not an easy question to answer. How do you both keep the integrity of sport and also allow trans women a place to compete? It's a conversation that involves a huge range of factors including the specific sport's physical demands, the level of the competition, and the stage of transitioning, among others.
The big problem is that it's a conversation that can only happen in any constructive way if everyone involved in the conversation unequivocally accepts trans people's personhood and their right to be respected for who they are. And most of the time we see his play out in public, including from the TERF-in-chief, that isn't the case. Rowling isn't interested in a nuanced conversation and arriving at an ultimately fair outcome. She's interested in persecuting trans women, full stop.
It isn't really that difficult. After a couple years of estrogen Trans women don't really have a physical advantage over cis women, infact some studies suggest we have a disadvantage (at least at the highest levels of most sports)
I always hear arguments about this from the type of guy who thinks he's better than every woman at every sport. I'm a little guy. I was never going to play basketball. Plenty of women are bigger, stronger, faster, whatever than I am. Normal women, not athletes. I have no idea how run of the mill regular old dudes have never had to confront this literal fact, but it would be better for everyone if they had.
Yeah itβs absolutely true that there is nuance here and itβs not an easy question to answer. How do you both keep the integrity of sport and also allow trans women a place to compete?
Current evidence suggests that trans women have effectively no physical advantage after I think it was 6 months of HRT. But I've also seen some articles suggesting that there isn't an inherent physical strength advantage between men and women to begin with. Basically men typically start with more muscle but men and women typically build muscle similarly.
And honestly if there actually are small advantages to be had for one gender vs another, imagine how cool it would be to have a team span between big burly people doing big burly things and small nimble people darting around between them, and the tactics one could do by changing up where they place which strength and how many of a given strength to have on the team
Current evidence suggests that trans women have effectively no physical advantage after I think it was 6 months of HRT
It varies by sport, which is why I mentioned that as one of the factors. At least according to a study referenced by Mia Mulder in this video, in middle-distance running trans women retain a 12% advantage over cis women after 2 years of hormone therapy. (And frankly, that video as a whole is an incredible overview of the subject of trans women's sports.)
imagine how cool it would be to have a team span between big burly people doing big burly things and small nimble people darting around between them
So, uhh... You know this is already a thing, right? Even when the entire team is cis men, in a sport like rugby you have the forwards who are huge walls of muscle, and wingers tend to be smaller and faster. I don't actually follow it, but I suspect gridiron may have an even higher degree of this...I guess you could call it positional dimorphism. While soccer has much less. This comes about due to the different nature of those sports.
But I've also seen some articles suggesting that there isn't an inherent physical strength advantage between men and women to begin with. Basically men typically start with more muscle but men and women typically build muscle similarly.
Men have something like 20x more testosterone than women, and testosterone has a massive impact on strength and endurance.
Anabolic steroids are literally meant to mimic testosterone. It's a hell of a drug
load more comments
(3 replies)
trans-excluding radical feminist
I'm amused to see we can categorize idiocy. (I don't have anything against feminism itself btw.)
load more comments
(5 replies)
I'm more concerned about how other roles in Quidditch are basically fighting for like 30 minutes while having no practical impact to the result of the game
It's been a while since I read them, but iirc, catching the snitch ends the games and gives a shitload of points to the catcher's team, but it doesn't automatically win the game if the opposing team is more points ahead than the team that gets the snitch. I think i' the books there are a few matches in which Harry can't catch the snitch but needs to keep the other team's catcher from catching it. Tho the amount of points the snitch gives is too high for it to occur often.
IIRC Joanne stated in interviews that she intentionally made the game beyond uselessly broken on purpose, to spite football fans or whatever. She is, very fundamentally to her person, a spiteful bitch.
Further proof to the stupidity of this: in the recent video game, ya can't even play quidditch. The feature doesn't exist, because the game would be literally unplayable.
Quidditch World Cup for the xbox was actually really fun. But then, I say that as a former quadball player. Quadball players are mostly trans allies. You're not allowed more than 4 people of the same gender on the field at once, so having enbies in your team gives a tactical advantage in terms of flexibility. They changed the name from Quidditch to Quadball after Rowling started being openly horrible to trans people.
She's full of crap. She clearly didn't understand sport when she wrote the first book.
I'm 96% sure this is an ad hoc excuse she came up with when faced with criticism.
The quidditch world cup in book 4 happened this way. The Irish won by points but they did not catch the snitch.
And there was a point in... 3, I think, where Harry was instructed to delay catching the snitch until they were at least 50 points up because they wouldn't have enough league points or something to progress if he didn't.
In the 1st movie, Oliver woods mistakenly said that if Harry catches the snitch they win I think that's where all the confusion comes from.
I mean in the books the matches typically score somewhere of 5-10 goals per team until Harry catches the snitch. So it is pretty much the catcher of the snitch gets to win the game.
Maybe we can give the benefit of the doubt that snitches used to be harder to catch before brooms became crazy fast and agile like the Nimbus and Firebolt series. It is mentioned that there were matches lasting for days, but in the book conveniently the matches never seem to last more than two hours or so.
Maybe the snitch was nerfed for school matches?
Could be, we know from 7 that they're bespoke for every match for catch dispute reasons, the artisans could probably tweak them to match a school league. That said, I don't believe Rowling put this much thought into it.
It should be noted the Irish team had the best catchers in the League, while the Bulgarian team was mediocre and carried by their seeker. And even then the Bulgarians only lost by a tiny bit.
If Rowling's goal was to show that other positions mattered, she chose a terrible way to do it. You'd have to be more than fifteen goals ahead in a game that often ends before a team scores fifteen goals, period.
And notably, the odds for this happening were extremely low, because the vast majority of the time the team that catches the snitch wins
The beaters try to beat the opponents off their broom, the chasers try to win points for their team, the goal keeper try to block the other team from scoring, the seeker tries to catch the snitch to end the game. The game does not end until the snitch is caught.
Everything except the snitch makes sense. It's worth like 15 goals.
The snitch was supposed to be very hard to catch, in the books they related about a game that lasted six months(?) rotating players until the snitch got caught. So 150 points is well worth it.
Nailed! You perfectly described the weird feeling I had for more than a decade and yet couldn't figure out what.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
4chan never disappoint
rather, they always disappoint precisely as much as you expect them to
"yes yes gas the jews whatever just get to the bit where you present a waterproof unified theory of everything, thus revolutionizing physics"
Anyone know of a trans Harry potter fanfic where they change themself into a girl with magic
I genuinely want to read one now
Edit:
https://old.reddit.com/r/HPfanfiction/comments/18udvt4/fics_where_male_harry_turns_into_a_girl/
2nd edit: I have just become aware the op of this post has pretty hateful bigoted post history just to make people aware
Thereβs an npc in a Skyrim mod who wants your help to find this magic tome. When you find it they use it to turn into a woman, coming out as trans. It was super cool, I genuinely didnβt expect it.
There's a quest in the old-school MMORPG Runescape where the player has to be a woman to proceed, and if playing as a male you get given a voucher for a free gender change.
No explicit comparisons to IRL trans people, but still, it's there.
I used to play the bajeezus out of that game and forgot about that quest.
On an related note, did you know about the 2009scape project? It's a surprisingly complete open source server and single player implementation of RuneScape circa early 2009. The server is super friendly and free to play on
I didn't know about that, no. To be honest, I haven't played the game since 2007; I dropped off of it for unrelated reasons, before the changes that came later that year which were the cause of people's upset that ended up creating 07Scape.
Chuck Tingle's Harriet Porber series.
I'll have to look it up when I get home, but there was one where Harry transitioned into Holly Potter. It was pretty good from what I read.
view more: next βΊ