this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
319 points (97.3% liked)

News

23275 readers
3456 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 57 points 5 months ago (5 children)

I'm always glad to see the government go after a consolidated vertical monopoly like these assholes. It is part of the government's damn job, afterall.

But it kind of feels like it's a play for optics when there are much larger issues.

[–] MyPornViewingAccount@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Its weird how a large group of people such as the federal government can work on more than one thing at a time.

Just because you dont know all the other things happening doesnt mean theyre not.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ticketmaster is an easy target. Apple, Amazon, Microsoft ,Google should have been cut to pieces years ago, yet here we are.

These companies have more revenue than some countries, this is mental and shouldn't happen.

So yeah, I get the cynicism.

[–] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

For such an easy target, Ticketmaster has operated with impunity for decades at this point. I agree it probably isn't the most pressing problem right now, but I am glad something is finally being done.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm glad they go after them, but I fear that they will use them as a scapegoat and do jackshit to other monopolies

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Dear US government, please stop climate change. I don't even go to concerts. I would feel bad about the gas it takes to get there

The current session doesn't even have a good record of doing one thing at once and political capital is not infinite. It's a legitimate concern to think we should be doing more important things.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

And it's weird how these things almost always get killed by someone like Joe Manchin or the SCOTUS in spite of all the hard work of those good people. Try to pay more attention to what is actually going on.

[–] Veraxus@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They are supposed to stop it looooong before it gets to this stage. Have one or more companies formed powerful trusts that give them significant power over a market? Break them apart and bust them open.

Instead, we twiddle our thumbs while bootlicking white knites tell you it’s not a monopoly because there are TWO trusts cornering entire markets.

It’s madness.

[–] 100@fedia.io 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

you are like those karens at council meetings who complain "why we spend money on this instead of this??" and nothing gets done as result

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

you sound like reddit. try to lemmy more.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Every broken up company is a victory

[–] Kalothar@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

At least it can set a precedent

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 30 points 5 months ago

I'm sure some conservative brainworm judge will block this somehow just like when the Biden admin tried to cap credit card late fees. This country won't be fixed until the only way judges can receive RVs as bribes is if they end up under the tires.

[–] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Been calling that this would happen in 2024 (election year) for 3 years now. It's the one thing all Americans agree on. But no matter the reason it's a good thing. Hopefully something actually happens.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I've clicked on this thumbnail twice thinking it was some weird fish.

[–] dwemthy@lemdro.id 5 points 5 months ago

It is though?

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

weird fish

Fetish

[–] mandurrz@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Can we focus on the cost of food and housing before entertainment?

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

He's doing that too.

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If it's not dismantling that god forsaken monopoly, it's not enough.

[–] kiku123@feddit.de 13 points 5 months ago

That is what they're doing though.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I'd rather have healthcare

Actually scratch that, the climate is the bigger issue.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Don't let perfect get in the way of good

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure cheaper concert tickets will come as a comfort to those who are struggling to pay for lifesaving medication.

They can ration their medication even more and go see Taylor Swift before they die.

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 1 points 5 months ago

Which meds are you referring to? He did an insulin price cap, does that count?

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

'Dont let environmental collapse get in the way of cheaper luxuries'

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 4 points 5 months ago

Well one is far more feasible to get than the other. Half the country supports a man who is openly soliciting bribes from oil companies ffs.

[–] sfbing@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Let's have all three. They are not conflicting goals.

[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

They’re already crashing though

[–] DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz 3 points 5 months ago (4 children)

It feels like a bid to buy young people's votes back. I pray our youth are not so shallow.

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 months ago

I'm as cynical as the next guy... But i feel like an administration that is willing to enforce antitrust laws (even if it is just for votes) is a good thing

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Just add it on top of women's and lbgtq rights and suddenly it sounds less shallow.

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I said the same before when they were playing with marijuana laws. People didn't like it and even said things like "I want my politicians to do things for votes."

Then a couple weeks later, the administration reversed course.

[–] DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz 1 points 5 months ago

It's just one perpetual mindfuck. I dont want to live on this planet anymore.

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 2 points 5 months ago

Hasn't this been in the works for over a year now, with the congressional hearing a while back?

Feels pretty bad if 2/4 years of stuff doesn't count.

[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Support small indie bands. No need for big businesses crap.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Finally. They listened! I'm so glad they finally are tackling this important problem. It is far more important than starving millions of people in a foreign country to support genocidal fascists.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Yes! I’m so glad the Biden administration decided that they can only tackle one issue at a time!111ii1!

And nobody was ever hurt by a monopoly!!! Let’s abandon all regulations and become ancaps!!!

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social -3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Thank god they're focusing on the real issues

[–] Jilanico@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

You might not be able to afford bread, but at least you'll get circuses.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I don't go to concerts and don't really personally care that much about ticket prices, but even from that position, antitrust issues are pretty much a real issue.

I do think that the framing of antitrust action as being specifically driven by the political layer is maybe obnoxious. The overwhelming bulk of federal Executive Branch activity is done by people who do not change from administration and whose actions do not change. A few people at the top whose job is oversight of them do change, but that drives a very small part of what the government does.