this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
125 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3191 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Was it one of the idiots intentionally drinking raw unprocessed milk to make a point?

[–] ReallyKinda@kbin.social 19 points 6 months ago

All the US cases and most cases worldwide are linked to people working closely with infected animals according to the article—no mention of raw milk.

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's like they're trying to start another pandemic just out of spite. All because someone told them not to...

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They have to start a pandemic now so they can blame Biden for it and credit Trump for ending it.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Can you imagine something like human-to-human bird flu being "managed" by Ronald McDonald and his cronies?

He couldn't even do the very least thing right for Covid and that is far less dangerous. Instead, spreading nonsense about horse dewormer, bleach and sunlight...and early on, more concerned with "his" stock market numbers than anything else.

Human-to-human bird flu would be terrible under any circumstances; under Spanky it'd be far, far worse.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 0 points 6 months ago

This erroneously assumes that practitioners of woo like raw milk drinking are all on the right. This is most certainly not true. And it's kind of weird to make it political.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

It can only be a pandemic if there is a human to human transfer. Virologists say it isn't likely to mutate enough to do that. Still, if you can get it from a cow, will your pet dog be next?

[–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Pandemic remix, round 2(or 7 depending who you ask) electric birdaloo

[–] secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Does anyone have an opinion as to how likely this is to eventually turn into a pandemic?

[–] match@pawb.social 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

As likely as any other flu, which is basically guaranteed. I doubt it will become a 2020-style shutdown though, purely because that would be unpopular

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

As likely as any other flu, which is basically guaranteed. I doubt it will become a 2020-style shutdown though, purely because that would be unpopular

It's not "basically guaranteed". H5N1 has been around for a while and was never really considered a serious threat before.

And a 2020-style shutdown would be the least of everyone's worries if this thing does blow up. The fatality rates in humans is around 40% or so. At that rate, you're talking about at the very least a complete breakdown of society as we know it, if not a full-blown extinction-level event.

[–] gac11@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Isn't it way more deadly than covid? Maybe that'll be reason enough to scare idiots into compliance?

[–] match@pawb.social 1 points 5 months ago

Early COVID variants were more fatal than later ones even before accounting for resistances; we might reasonably expect that the variant that does breakthrough will be less deadly, if only because an extremely deadly virus tends to incapacitate the people who would otherwise be spreading it

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And the government is now working with Pfizer and Moderna on an Avian flu vaccine.

[–] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Do you have a source for that?

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

No problem. It's making me concerned about the large number of doses for something that doesn't go human to human. Yet.

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Around here when swine flu went through the country we basically lost the whole pork industry because the first priority was to eliminate the disease. Does the US want a pandemic to be named after them? Because it seems to head in that direction. I think Freedom Flu is a pretty catchy name personally.

[–] Dreizehn@kbin.social -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Are the CCP and PLA up to more shit?

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Do all the birds come from China?

[–] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Don't you mean the WHO? How else are they going to get their next $50 billion?