this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
661 points (98.0% liked)

People Twitter

5263 readers
1538 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 90 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Maybe it goes the other way.... The fact that there is a housing crisis is the direct result of unnecessary sex scenes in movies. If they didn't put those scenes in, there would be less people clamouring to move out of their parents house, thus lowering the demand for housing.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 46 points 6 months ago

We need a politician to run on this platform!

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nah, it's the corporations buying up all the housing to sell for rentals or airbnbs that is causing the housing crisis, not awkward sex scenes.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

... Do you think he was being serious?

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

No, just pointing out the real reason so the humor is more obvious.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's a self regulating problem really if you think about it.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

If filmmakers adjust the amount of unnecessary sex scenes depending on how many people live with their parents, then it's what ecologists would call a negative feedback loop.

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 43 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Sorry guys, could you do less sex scenes pls? Everytime i watch a movie, I'd like to have empathetic connection with the characters, and since I'm using arch btw, all the aformentioned scenes ruin all the immersion for me :(

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How ArchLinux users can get to have sex:

  1. Burn ArchLinux to a CD.

  2. Fuck the center hole of the CD.

[–] AlolanYoda@mander.xyz 7 points 6 months ago

Wait... You're telling me all of those wallpapers with anime girls on them do not translate to an active sex life? I feel like I've been lied to!

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Us arch users have started a group we meet up Friday nights

Latitude: -75.4321 Longitude: 123.4567

11.00pm UT

Bring gluten and lactose free vagen snack

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 months ago

If I get on the boat now I can be there in like 2 or 3 months.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

Unless I'm specifically watching porn, I generally don't like sex scenes in movies. I always feel like I'm watching something I shouldn't be watching.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They're really useless in most movies. Last awesome sex scene I've seen was in Gone Girl - where Neil Patrick Harris gets well and truely fucked.

[–] evidences@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

You clearly don't watch bridgerton then, for instance the last scene of episode 4 of season three had one of the characters getting finger blasted in the back of a coach before the dude got out and offer the women help down using the same hand he was just going to town on her lady bits with. This was scene was VITAL to the plot.

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Hell ye. Great film!

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Does this hit a little to close to (your parents’) home?

[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Sex scenes can absolutely feed a narrative purpose, like in Game of Thrones where it's almost always a political motivation or has a greater meaning to it. However, if I wanted to watch two people have sex, I would go to a different site to watch it/wouldn't go to a movie theater for it.

People aren't upset about sex scenes, they're upset about unnecessary ones.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Well ok but is it necessary to show the fake, non explicit sex act? I.e. is the plot furthered by watching b list actress #537 show her boobs for 20 seconds while dry humping another b list actor, of course without actually showing anything explicit?

Implied sex, like the scene tastefully cutting out once they start undressing would work just as well.

Just to be clear, I'm sex positive, let me watch two semi famous people fuck on camera if I am supposed to get aroused while watching. Or make a movie that stands on its own without, that I can watch without ending up with an awkward boner.

I just think that the american, prudish softcore “nudity“ of showing some boobs for ratings is the worst of both worlds, can't watch it as a clean family movie or show but it also isnt explicit enough to make it worth watching when horny.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago

Unnecessary romance plot is pushed into most movies. If i have to sit through the boring romance scenes, i would rather see some boobs as a reward.

Get rid of the unnecessary romance or let the sex scenes be.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I would go to a different site to watch it/wouldn’t go to a movie theater for it.

The internet really did change a lot of things away from how older generations view society. I think this point alone carries OP's post - T&A in a movie isn't exactly the draw it used to be. Even romantic content^1^ is easier to find on streaming than it was ever made popular on TV or movies.

1 - For "trashy" romantic content, Anime is doing the heavy lifting these days.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

spoilerasdfasfasfasfas

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 8 points 6 months ago

Y'all straight people who only just heard of this discourse should spend more time listening to asexuals

load more comments
view more: next ›