this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
193 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37708 readers
401 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

Well, I think they look cute.

[–] MrFloppy@feddit.de 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I think "Draisy" is faster on the track and a much more realistic project. But "Monocab" is a University project, so it's ok for me that a few millions are invested there.

[–] Landsharkgun@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, this looks much better. My other thought would be road-rail buses, but getting on/off the tracks might be too much work to be worth the extra flexibility.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I've seen one of those in Japan. Even they admit that the only reason they continue to run it is for the novelty factor, it's apparently quite expensive to keep going and not really that efficient.

It takes a good while to convert between the two modes since you have to be really careful you don't misalign the thing and result in a derail. So it's done, very, very, slowly.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Looks like walking speed in their testing.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Anything faster would be a safety issue.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›