this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
390 points (99.0% liked)

News

23311 readers
3962 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic lawmakers accuse companies of shrinking product sizes while charging consumers the same price

It's becoming a common experience for Americans going to the grocery store: your bag of chips seems lighter, your favorite drink comes in a slimmer bottle, and you're running out of laundry detergent more quickly than usual. And yet things are staying the same price.

On Monday two Democratic lawmakers launched an attempt to get to the bottom of the phenomena, accusing three major companies, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo and General Mills, of shrinking the size of products while charging consumers the same price -- a price-gouging practice known as "shrinkflation".

...

Shrinking the size of a product in order to gouge consumers on the price per ounce is not innovation, it’s exploitation,” Warren and Dean said in a statement. “Unfortunately, this price gouging is a widespread problem, with corporate profits driving over half of inflation.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

The federal government should just enact a national unit price mandate for fair comparison shopping.

Currently, eighteen (18) states and one (1) territories have unit pricing laws or regulations in force. Ten (10) of these have mandatory unit pricing provisions. They are: Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and the District of Columbia.

https://www.nist.gov/pml/owm/national-legal-metrology/us-retail-pricing-laws-and-regulations

[–] Docus@lemmy.world 63 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Unit pricing helps. A French supermarket also puts shrinkflation warning stickers on shelves where packaging size changed but price has not, that too should be mandatory

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

IIRC Hungary made it mandatory a while ago.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

for how long do the stickers stay up?

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is the right way to go about it. Telling companies they can’t do x or y doesn’t jive with capitalism if they aren’t deemed monopolies.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Unregulated capitalism is clearly a shitshow so why are you arguing against an entire class of regulations for no real reason other than historical precedence? There's no such thing as an inherent rule. They're all just as made up as the rest.

[–] 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok, but how do you see the proposed legislation playing out? How do you expect congress to set a specific amount of product that can no longer be reduced? It’s not like anyone can trust congress to revisit the law when changes are needed. Companies will just start making “six packs” of individual things that used to be sold as a six units per container in order to maintain flexibility to shift quantities in the future. This will lead to way more packaging.

Regulating capitalism is a very good thing, but I don’t see how it makes any sense in this case with the proposed legislation.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

No one has proposed any specific legislation. We're talking about theoretical concepts. My only point is that saying "that's not how capitalism works" is a dumb thing to say when it comes to rejecting an idea because we are collectively making up the rules for how capitalism works as we go along. It can work in whatever way we want it to.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That’s a straw man argument and adds nothing to this conversation.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He says, while adding nothing to the conversation.

[–] clif@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can I also add nothing? It'll make me feel important with no consequences.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 month ago

I got enough out of this that I feel you should try again, but try harder not to try so hard.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Great, now I can more accurately compare how all the brands are shrinking at roughly the same rate. The problem isn’t consumer education, it’s implicit market collusion. Coke shrinks and doesn’t lose profit so Pepsi shrinks so Coke shrinks so Pepsi shrinks, etc - a race to the bottom feedback loop.

Unit pricing is good, but I don’t really think it solves this particular issue. Every time I see unit price even listed it’s in tiny, near illegible font under the massive bold item price, and every time I’ve point d the out to people they don’t give a shit because they aren’t going to spend 5 minutes comparing the prices of soda bottles so they can squeeze out less than a dime’s worth of savings.

[–] 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem isn’t consumer education, it’s implicit market collusion.

Nailed it. And this is why your comment about notifying customers is also correct. Consumers barely have a choice. Everything is overpriced.

they aren’t going to spend 5 minutes comparing the prices of soda bottles so they can squeeze out less than a dime’s worth of savings.

It’s all about those percentages. My favorite chips went from 60¢/oz to 85¢/oz. Clearly not worth my time in terms of absolute price difference, but that’s a 41.67% increase. If I just ignore the amount through my whole grocery trip, the difference at the checkout line is huge. It becomes worth my time very quickly.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

You can explain that to people but it still won't convince them to spend any amount of time doing math in a grocery store unless they're so desperate for cash that the problem is well beyond the scope of pricing schemes.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I frequently make decisions based on ($/oz, $/g, or $/ml) unit pricing, but I also have very limited income.