this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
838 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59415 readers
2821 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Or get network wide blocking. Doesn’t prevent everything but it does prevent most ads. Makes the internet tolerable at least.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 61 points 1 month ago (1 children)

nah, lets get them switched away from chromium based spy machines.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Not everyone can. Work machines for instance.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can't install extensions on a work machine but you can add a network wide blocker?

[–] kjaeselrek@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Possibly, if you work from home

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wouldn't a company VPN bypass all that even though you are using your own internet connection to connect to the outside world?

[–] kjaeselrek@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Maybe, I guess I don’t know enough to answer that. I do know that being on a company VPN isn’t always a requirement, though.

Either way, I’m not trying to argue for one approach to ad blocking over another as a one-size-fits-all solution, I just wanted to point out that it’s possible to have more control over the network than the computer in some cases.

[–] kill_dash_nine@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Typically yes, assuming that the company VPN sets DNS to a set of company DNS servers. That is how my company’s works and several others I’ve worked for in the past.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

sadly, agreed. mindshare leads to adoption, tho - so putting Firefox in front of more faces is always a positive. after all, its how google dominates.

[–] shininghero@pawb.social 7 points 1 month ago

Depends on how lax the IT department is when it comes to random executables. I was able to move the firefox installer to the appdata root, and run a non-admin install to my user profile.

[–] rickdg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Something like NextDNS as a no-brainer? It works but hits the limit of the free tier if people use it beyond their phone.

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

PiHole and a TailScale exit node so you can use it for DNS whether or not you're on your home network.

[–] Alph4d0g@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

Or a variation of this is TailScale configured to use NextDNS and a TS exit node. That's for anyone who doesn't want to maintain a PiHole. I've done both. Personal choice.

[–] GustavoFring@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

ControlD then.

[–] datendefekt@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Pihole is good for a private network, but you can forget it in a work setting, especially corporate networks.

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

I recommended pihole to my senior webdeveloper. She didn't know about it and was blown away by the concept. She installed it immediately and is now living happily ad free.