Technology

59415 readers

3102 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1149

Google looks to be fully shutting down unsupported extensions and ad blockers in Chrome, such as uBlock Origin – which might push some folks to switch to Firefox (www.techradar.com)

submitted 1 month ago by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

296 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Clearly, Google is serious about trying to oust ad blockers from its browser, or at least those extensions with fuller (V2) levels of functionality. One of the crucial twists with V3 is that it prevents the use of remotely hosted code – as a security measure – but this also means ad blockers can’t update their filter lists without going through Google’s review process. What does that mean? Way slower updates for said filters, which hampers the ability of the ad-blocking extension to keep up with the necessary changes to stay effective.

(This isn’t just about browsers, either, as the war on advert dodgers extends to YouTube, too, as we’ve seen in recent months).

At any rate, Google is playing with fire here somewhat – or Firefox, perhaps we should say – as this may be the shove some folks need to get them considering another of the best web browsers out there aside from Chrome. Mozilla, the maker of Firefox, has vowed to maintain support for V2 extensions, while introducing support for V3 alongside to give folks a choice (now there’s a radical idea).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I kinda have to at work. Our classroom computers reset between classes and Chrome is the only browser installed. I might ask IT about that, moving forward, given uBlock getting neutered soon.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

when you ask them, don't only mention ublock, but the privacy aspects of only allowing the browser of the largest data collection fueled ad company

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Honestly, our IT peeps aren't idiots. They'd probably agree with me. It's admin who make the overall decisions. I might be able to swing "also Firefox" to be included when they inevitably update the repo.

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I have a similar issue at my school as well. Chrome is the only allowed browser, and each of us have to use our own school email as our login session in chrome, so we get that much of user space, and that actually works quite decently. I had ublock installed on my user account so far, but if it breaks, I'll just have to suffer. Although, the real problem is that the school I work in uses some digital books that only work 100% in Chrome, and all show some form of weird behaviour in non-chromiun based browsers. And there's a 0 chance they are changing it.

[–] KonalaKoala@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And the only place I can think of where uBlock is not getting neutered anytime soon is in LibreWolf.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Firefox is fucking with uBlock Origin, too? I was not aware.

[–] KonalaKoala@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

I didn't say anything about Firefox fucking with uBlock Origin, but was merely suggesting to try LibreWolf as its a hardened Firefox fork that comes with uBlock Origin preinstalled.