Privacy

32456 readers

1014 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Mozilla doubling down on ads in Firefox (blog.mozilla.org)

submitted 2 months ago by Blizzard@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

57 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/23894598

Despite its emphasis on protecting privacy, Mozilla is moving towards integrating ads, backed by new infrastructure from their acquisition of Anonym. They claim this will maintain a balance between user control and online ad economics, using privacy-preserving tech. However, this shift appears to contradict Mozilla's earlier stance of protecting users from invasive advertising practices, and it signals a change in their priorities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Gotta pay the bills somehow, and I’m just happy they care about privacy.

[–] pipariturbiini@sopuli.xyz 64 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

I dislike ads as much as the next person, and find uBlock Origin necessary for browsing the web, but the cold fact is that the internet is run with advertising, whether you like it or not.

If that is done without creating a profile on me, and without crippling the reading/viewing experience, I can tolerate advertisement.

I assume this is also an action towards becoming independent from Google funding; which is a good thing.

[–] mnmalst@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Happy to see some sane comments here. Couldn't have said it better. You can hate ads and still keep a foot in reality.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I choose to keep both feet firmly planted in unreality.

[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If ads are necessary for the internet, I'm going back to reading books. It was fun y'all.

[–] parpol@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They put ads in books too, unfortunately. The internet ones you can block.

[–] TurtleTourParty@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago

Book ads are at least usually at the end of the book and for other books you might want to read. And they're static. If internet ads were like book ads I wouldn't have to block them.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The internet is run with egress contracts. The web is run with ads.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Okay bud. Have a biscuit 🍪

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yay :)

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

?? What? Bird law got nothin to do with the web you crazy

[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I absolute despise ads but they are a necessary evil, it can be implemented well if it is not done intrusive and doesn't take up more space then the content it self. Also if it are mostly scam ads and such they might as well not have ads at all.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Fuck ads.

You're lying to yourself if you think ads will ever be delivered without tracking.

This whole "anonymization" nonsense is a lie. It's been shown, repeatedly, that data can be de-anonymised, especially data that's not exactly narrowly collected.