this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
466 points (97.4% liked)

Firefox

17752 readers
222 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 32 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

fuckFuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck

But at least forking is still an option. The instant they make any moves that inhibit forking or privacy on forks, Firefox will be completely dead. For now, it’s just gangrenous.

[–] Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Good luck with even maintaining that fork up to date , with security threats and web standards changing so quickly.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Chromium manages (obsfucated binary blobs from google still being included aside)

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago

Chromium is developed by Google. It's not some grassroots fork with user interests in mind...

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

The thing is, people willing to maintain a fork could contribute to Firefox today, and reduce the development cost, reduce the need for income.

Sure, some people will be more willing to contribute, if it's a pure grassroots effort, or if they're left without a browser otherwise, but to just assume that a fork will fix it, that's wishful thinking.

[–] tux0r@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wish that most forks wouldn't be even worse. Pale Moon, the most interesting one, is a gang of patent trolls.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

Pale Moon feels like it forked during the peak of Windows Vista, and hasn't updated its UI, or extension library since.

LibreWolf, Mullvad Browser, and Waterfox feel the most up to date, while being FOSS.