this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
31 points (86.0% liked)

Selfhosted

40198 readers
860 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I’m happily serving a few websites and services publicly. Now I would like to host my Navidrome server, but keep the contents private on the web to stay out of trouble. I’m afraid that when I install a reverse proxy, it’ll take my other stuff ~~online~~ offline and causes me various headaches that I’m not really in the headspace for at the moment. Is there a safe way to go about doing this selectively?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] femtech@midwest.social 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I just don't put the ports on the proxy config.

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So those ports that I don’t put in the config remain publicly accessible? That would be perfect.

[–] femtech@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

The ports you don't put in are not publicly routed.

I use NPM and only have 3 services routed outside my network.