this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
46 points (96.0% liked)

World News

32220 readers
292 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

They strapped an m4 on some servos on a robot dog with a rangefinder camera on top.

I would have expectedly a gun designed for the dog like some tank turret. This is less impressive than expected.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Cheaper than a ground up design. But I think you can start the clock until someone uses a grinder and cuts the gun right off.

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 1 points 2 weeks ago

From a product development viewpoint, the gun is an uninteresting part. It's better to use something that already has a mature production line and has been thoroughly field tested. It's the vision and control systems they are interested in developing, the gun is just the chosen end effector for this application.

Even when they're ready to start deploying systems like this, there's a lot of value in using compenents that the military already has a lot of spare parts for and that personnel know how to maintain. I wouldn't expect a custom gun until units like this are commonplace.