this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
1695 points (95.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

6029 readers
2134 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Corporate greed aside none sane would like their tax money either to be spent on producing electricity when it’s not needed.

You need to set the corporate greed aside in your own mind, too (not saying you're greedy, saying you've been indoctrinated to only see life in capitalist terms). Stop thinking in "cost" or "profit", start thinking in "benefit" and "use". Producing electricity when it isn't needed is only a problem when someone is looking to make money off of it.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Producing electricity when it isn't being used is problematic for the grid. So is producing too little.

[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Producing electricity when it isn’t needed is only a problem when someone is looking to make money off of it.

I never said it should be. There are plenty of ways to regulate electricity production, storage, and even usage, they just aren't considered "profitable" so are dismissed, overlooked, and or deliberately smeared and destroyed because they threaten those whose profits they would hurt.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Yes, but we already have many solutions ti store energy. Let's spend the fossil fuel industry subsidies on scaling these storage method instead.

[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Changing the words does not change the meaning.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

It’s valid to think in terms of cost IMO even when trying to drive the concept of profit out of the discussion. It’s just a matter of using limited resources in efficient way that leads to more benefit.

The cost units don’t need to be dollars or euros. It could be in tons of a natural resource or some other thing that’s more tangible than money. But as long as those resources are limited in some way, it would be great to get more MW or MWh for the same resources put in.

The sick corporate greed part affects which costs get ignored though, like the externalities. They think “sure I’m poisoning our food supply and killing people every day, but nobody takes money out of MY bank account because of it.”