this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
28 points (96.7% liked)
VS Code
788 readers
1 users here now
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
At first glance it looks like a SourceTree clone. What does fork provide that SourceTree doesn't?
It's basically just a better sourcetree.
If you're already used to sourcetree, it's a really smooth transition.
The main reason to switch away from sourcetree is the bugs and papercuts.
Bugs: Sure, bugs happen with everything but you're stuck with them when they happen with sourcetree. There was an issue not too long ago where sourcetree couldn't scroll. It was classed as a low priority bug and took about a year for it to be fixed. Imagine needing to use your keyboard to scroll up and down, but then git would refresh and take you back to the top where you'd need to start again. Now imagine trying to do that for a whole year. And that was just one bug.
Papercuts: It's so good at some things that you want to forgive the flaws in other things and find workarounds to bugs, but after a while they build up into poisoning you're experience. For example: things going slow in larger repos, getting git errors when staging certain lines because a different line in the middle had to be staged/removed in a different order, the bi-yearly account issues, etc...
The thing is, you don't need to put up with it since fork already does everything that sourcetree does (and a bit more), and they actually spend time sanding off the papercuts so you don't need to worry about finding workarounds when something goes wrong.
Just losing the bugs without losing any features is already reason enough to switch.
But there's also the improvements over sourcetree as well: