Technology

60048 readers

2782 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

438

OceanGate’s ill-fated Titan sub relied on a hand-typed Excel spreadsheet (www.theverge.com)

submitted 3 months ago by Korkki@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

81 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 84 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Of course not! We employees of Fortune 500 companies use Google Sheets to manage critical data.

It's in the cloud, that's how you know it's good.

(I'm not even joking....our VP said this)

[–] doctortran@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Excel effectively forces cloud usage now if you want to use autosave. And frankly, Microsoft is doing everything it can to shift users to cloud based Office apps.

They really, really want users and business owners to think of the local data storage and desktop computing as secondary to OneDrive and Webapps. I swear at some point in the future the consumer version of Windows will be little more than the Edge browser in a wig.

[–] IamAnonymous@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Companies now prefer cloud storage because they will still have the data if they fire you as your access will be lost immediately. You could delete all local files and it will take lot of time and effort to recover them.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I swear at some point in the future the consumer version of Windows will be little more than the Edge browser in a wig.

Does that mean the install size might wind up being less than 23.2 gigs?

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

I bet, they think about surface running edgeOS, lol

[–] msage@programming.dev 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I just wish the whole 'cloud' thing would die in a ditch specifically for people like that.

No, most use-cases don't need to be in a cloud.

You are 99.9% paying more for that setup than having people who understand servers.

And if you need the cloud, then hooray for you, but it should not need to be subsidized by thousands of small customers who jumped on the wrong train.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Agreed.

This is some of the best writing as to how/why/when cloud sucks.

I've shared it with my consulting friends, so they can more easily explain to (SMB) clients why cloud isn't necessarily a good answer.

[–] msage@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago

Old-man-yelling-at-clouds energy :D