this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
150 points (98.7% liked)

Opensource

1366 readers
45 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's really sad. But it sounds like a natural consequence of doing it under capitalism. I wish for a time when everything will be open source by default

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This really is the only way if we want competition (lower prices) and choice. All actual revenues would be derived from service provision (consulting, customization, tech support, certification).

From a "small c" capitalism perspective, it is not normal that MS, Nvidia, Apple have such insane margins. Competition should have forced them to lower prices while offering the same level of products/services.

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Regulation that prevent's insane copmpamy buys and mergers.

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It won't happen. What might is paying back if you use it for commercial projects.

Something like you pay some percent of your gross to an organisation and that gets split between the top level dependencies you use and then split down through their dependencies.

Software remains free for non commercial use, companies pay a fair share and the Devs get paid.

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I guess it's a wishful thinking, on the line of corporations pay for the damage and pollution they create...