this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
1389 points (94.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9626 readers
252 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Image transcript:

Calvin (from Calvin & Hobbes) sitting at a lemonade stand, smiling, with a sign that reads, "Trains and micromobility are inevitably the future of urban transportation, whether society wants it or not. CHANGE MY MIND."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Driverless cars will very much have a future because you can't build trains everywhere. They won't be personally owned though, i.e. they'll be robotaxis. Just imagine cities without parked cars.

[–] Maladius@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I agree trains will just be more common for distance. I also agree driverless cars will be more common, but would add I think we'll see more one person, two person, eight person cars in the city. No point in sending a four person car to take John to see his grandma.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

We already have a system where you can request a car to come to your location, take you there and then it goes off and drives around doing the same thing for other people. I don't know why it being autonomous means that people will ditch their private cars for it.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if japan can build trains, high speed ones at that then I think it's safe to say you can build trains anywhere you fucking want.

[–] chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You certainly can build trains wherever you want, but it comes at a cost that's not necessarily worth paying everywhere, as it comes with both short term and maintenance costs. I say this as someone who works in rail and is passionate about it; in some locations there isn't the demand to run the kind of high frequency service necessary to remove the need for car ownership. You can be better off with a demand responsive bus service, for example, to connect to your long-distance, high speed links.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

counter argument, Switzerland.