this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59201 readers
3022 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Amazon saved children's voices recorded by Alexa even after parents asked for it to be deleted. Now it's paying a $25 million fine.::"For too long, Amazon has treated children's sensitive data as its own property," Josh Golin, executive director of Fairplay, said in a statement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Should have been 25% of profits. Percentage based systems work.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago

25% of revenue, not profits. If it was profits then the fine would likely be $0 due to creative accounting.

[–] EatMyDick@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lolololol 25% of profits for keeping on to recordings for too long? You people are insane. You just hate Amazon and want to stick it to them.

The irony is none of these lemmy instances are run by companies with registrations and can do whatever the fuck they want when your data yet everyone is a okay cause pinky promise I hate Reddit too! 🤦‍♂️

[–] tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

25% of profits for wilfully breaching privacy law... that's actually quite low given what creative accounting can do for profits.

GDPR maximum fine is 4% of global turnover. Luckily for amazon it's capped otherwise they'd be on the hook for billions.

[–] EatMyDick@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Christ, that type of penalty has no bearing of actual damages. They kept the data longer than another party thought was needed. The actual damage was minimal. They have a robust set of controls and are one of the better tech companies to work with in regards to child protection. A whole hell of a lot more than these lemmy instances doing literally nothing to protect childrens data.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can somewhat trust some people with your data if there is no profit motive. You can't trust a corporation or a government. Ever.

[–] EatMyDick@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👌