this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
910 points (97.9% liked)

News

23287 readers
3732 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Police opened fire on a subway platform in Brooklyn during a confrontation with an alleged fare-beater, striking the man cops said was armed with a knife, two straphangers caught in the fray, and one of the firing officers, NYPD officials said Sunday.

One of those two passengers hit by the cops' bullets, a 49-year-old man, was hospitalized in critical condition after he was hit struck in the head, according to the NYPD.

The two officers who opened fire were assigned to patrol the Sutter Avenue subway stop in the 73rd precinct when they spotted a man skip the station turnstile and walk through an open gate toward the train platform, Chief of Department Jeffrey Maddrey explained at an evening press conference from Brookdale Hospital.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If someone runs a red light, and a cop tries to pull them over to give them a ticket, and instead the guy jumps out of the car and tries to attack the cop with a knife and gets shot in self-defense, it is absolutely not accurate to frame that as "cop shot that guy for running a red light".

But this is what exactly the OP is trying to do. And that's bullshit.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Police don't chase for red lights anymore specifically because the damage car chases were doing was out of line with the civil infraction.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't see how that's relevant to anything. A police officer walking after another person, on foot, doesn't have the potential for collateral damage that a car chase does.

It is completely ridiculous to frame this as "police shot a man over $2.90", when the shooting only happened after a verbal death threat, brandishing a lethal weapon, followed by an overt attempt to make good on that threat with that weapon.

Only the most ACAB-addled mind would think it appropriate to frame the events that way.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A police officer walking after another person, on foot, doesn't have the potential for collateral damage that a car chase does.

Looks at the number of people that got shot.

Obviously that's not true.

And all of that stuff with the weapon is based only on the police claims. The same police that won't release the body camera footage.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Looks at the number of people that got shot.

Obviously that’s not true.

Not as a result of two people walking, but as a result of someone brandishing a knife and attempting murder in a public place. Cringe goalpost move.

And all of that stuff with the weapon is based only on the police claims.

And all of what you're saying is based on literally nothing but your hate boner for police, lmao.

The image released shows a knife clutched in the criminal's hand. I'm sure he was strolling around like that very innocently and cops just opened fire on him for a laugh, right?

The straw-grasping is incredible.

The same police that won’t release the body camera footage.

Like it'd matter to your type. We have extensive hard video evidence of what happened with Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha, all put online publicly mere days after the event, and there are still innumerable imbeciles claiming shit it directly contradicts happened, lol.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lol, you guys used the same argument about car chases. Just two cars driving. It's an absurdist reduction.

And no it's not based on hate. It's based on the police being found to lie over and over again. Even with video footage available. They just aren't credible. And you bending over backwards to defend them shooting into a crowd is repugnant.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Fact: Bigotry is hate. Fact: Assuming someone is a liar based on their job is textbook bigotry.

Therefore, yes, it's based on hate.

ACABers are so obsessed with their prejudicial hate that they actually happily swallowed the complete fabrication in the OP's title, and ACTUALLY convinced themselves that cops saw someone jump a turnstile and their initial immediate reaction was to open fire on them, lmao.