this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
102 points (99.0% liked)

RetroGaming

19127 readers
173 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What's the problem with SwanStation? Forks are perfectly okay and normal with the GPL, that's the fucking point of the GPL.

[–] anyhow2503@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's exactly why they're changing the license. The problem with Swanstation are the developers. Retroarch in general has some pretty horrible people maintaining it and this isn't the first time they've harassed an emulator dev over nothing.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And "it is already out there so they can't take it away":

swanstation is already a few versions back feature wise? But, regardless, it will rapidly become outdated as new "tech" is added to emulation and issues are found with third party libraries or code. Good software needs good support and just having a ten year old hash is almost always worse than useless.

[–] zephr_c@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Is that really even true of emulators of old consoles? There's not a lot of new features coming out for the original PlayStation. Either way, part of the reason that SwanStation is dead is that it's not even the best libretro PS1 emulator anyway.