this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
415 points (98.1% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
977 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    415
    Most successful open source operating system (lemmy.world)
    submitted 2 months ago by ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    macOS uses the lack of defense that BSD provides (for Darwin). That's what Open Source licences are.

    There are more examples of Open Source project:

    MINIX 3 -> Derives into one of the worst pieces of malware ever. The Intel Management Engine.

    There is no such Open Source licence infringement. Open Source licences like BSD clause 3 are permissive in every aspect (well maybe not in TM part). They are so open that they allow restricting the freedom of the software.

    Linus Torvalds already stated (LinuxCon 2016):

    Over the years I've become convinced that the BSD license is great for code you don't care about. I'll use it myself. If there’s a library routine that I just want to say 'hey, this is useful to anybody and I’m not going to maintain this,' I’ll put it under the BSD license.

    Referring to Free (libre) Software as Open Source is a disqualification of those projects and their philosophy.