this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
32 points (78.6% liked)

Technology

59342 readers
4809 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
32
To fight AI, we need 'personhood credentials,' say AI firms (www.theregister.com)
submitted 2 months ago by 31337@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

AI firms propose 'personhood credentials' to combat online deception, offering a cryptographically authenticated way to verify real people without sacrificing privacy—though critics warn it may empower governments to control who speaks online.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Digital IDs are fine.

For an extremely small handful of scenarios where an actual ID is required, like banking.

It absolutely should be a violation of federal law, with massive, extremely punitive consequences, to use it for age verification for adult content, let alone social media or other websites.

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I for one would be fine with a digital ID to be used for even age verification, so long as it is only used for verification and is completely detached from any other form of identification. Honestly I'm getting kinda sick of rumors of Russian and Chinese trolls, true or not, as well as AI commenters influencing genuine discourse.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

And harassment and cheating in online games…

Lots of things suffer due to ban evasion. If bans worked, the internet would be a very different place.

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Right now I could go create 30 sock puppet accounts to respond to this. Is that really a good thing?

Let government offer the service of "here is a way any human can certifiably identify themselves online" and let people decide what providers they want to give that info to.

If you want to use or run anonymous social media, that's fine.

I don't.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If the alternative is corporations violating privacy even more? Absolutely.

The absolute maximum information it's legal for corporations should be a dozen orders of magnitude less than they do right now, and asking a single user for an ID without a clear, bulletproof cause should be an instant corporate death penalty with every bit of data they've ever collected erased.

Privacy is a fundamental right and you shouldn't be allowed to operate anywhere if you don't respect it absolutely.