this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
72 points (97.4% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

2611 readers
195 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In their defense, a judge probably would try and answer basic legal questions to support a defendant who for some reason didn't have a lawyer to ask, unless that defendant had already gone out of their way to antagonise the judge.

Sadly, I suspect there's a lot of overlap between people who are representing themselves and people who have annoyed the judge

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I was under the impression they’re not allowed to provide legal advice, but IANAL.

[–] butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

They're not, but there's a difference between providing legal advice and explaining necessary procedures the pro se individual must follow, explaining that a necessary form is available online in their bank of forms, explaining that something they did is procedurally improper, etc etc. The latter is actually pretty common, just out of necessity really.

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago

IANAL

What you do in the privacy of your own home is none of my business. /s