this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
20 points (58.5% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2503 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A US-based aid group admitted Friday that a group of individuals — who the Israeli military says were armed — took control of an aid convoy in the southern Gaza Strip the day before, without the organization having vetted them or coordinated the matter with the Israel Defense Forces.

The military said Thursday that it struck the gunmen, killing them while not harming aid workers.

According to the IDF, Hamas operatives frequently try to hijack aid deliveries.

The IDF had said on Thursday that a convoy of aid trucks from the American Near East Refugee Aid (Anera) organization entered the southern Rafah area with Israeli coordination. It said that during the drive, it identified a group of gunmen taking over a vehicle at the front of the convoy and beginning to lead it. The IDF described the act as a hijacking attempt.

Shortly afterward, the IDF said it was able to determine that it could strike just the car with the gunmen, without harming the rest of the convoy, and so it carried out a strike, killing at least four.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Count042@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You're right about the ICJ vs ICC which is a mistake I don't ordinarily make. My only execute for that is I woke up in the middle of the night from a migraine.

Your quotes however are extremely cherry picked, and your description of what they mean is absolutely wrong.

Part of the case was about establishing South Africa's right to bring the case, but part of it was to determine the plausibility of the charge.

https://www.npr.org/2024/01/26/1227078791/icj-israel-genocide-gaza-palestinians-south-africa

The International Court of Justice has found it is "plausible" that Israel has committed acts that violate the Genocide Convention. In a provisional order delivered by the court's president, Joan Donoghue, the court said Israel must ensure "with immediate effect" that its forces not commit any of the acts prohibited by the convention.

Donoghue said the court cannot make a final determination right now on whether Israel is guilty of genocide. But she said that given the deteriorating situation in Gaza, the court has jurisdiction to order measures to protect Gaza's population from further risk of genocide.

But, I'm sure NPR is Hamas, right?

[–] oberstoffensichtlich@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Since when does the West Bank have restrictions on Journalists entering?

You don’t believe the president of the court you cite, okay then.

[–] Count042@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago

I literally posted a link, so others don't have to determine of over cherry picked my quote that shows my assertion.

You don't believe anything that goes counter to your love for an apartheid government.