this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
158 points (79.5% liked)

Linux

48331 readers
505 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For me

Mint

Manjaro

Zorin

Garuda

Neon

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And arch. Arch is godly.

(I use Arch btw.)

[–] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm gonna say "no", but just by personal preference.
I agree that, if you're skilled enough, 90% of distributions out there are completely useless once Arch and Debian are available.

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Couldn’t agree more. Arch is great if you need a malleable distro, Debian is for everything (else).

[–] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Debian is great if you want a stable distro. If you want the latest software run... Debian + Flatpak

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Do you install ffmpeg via Flatpak?

In the spirit of your comment though, I have been meaning to try Debian Stable with Distrobox / Arch.

[–] Kangie@lemmy.srcfiles.zip 0 points 1 year ago

I don't know about you, but I don't mail my disteos; rsync is much faster.

[–] OrdinaryAlien@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I've used Arch on many different computers over the years. It's not stable, it breaks. I don't understand why it's great. Debian (minimal install) is better.

[–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I've only had one problem with arch (it broke after an update once) except for that one problem it was always very stable and solid in my experience.

Debian is too "old" for me. I prefer bleeding edge and i refuse to use any flatpaks or such because they are a pain in the ass to set up right in my experience