Linguistics Humor

1066 readers

41 users here now

Do you like languages and linguistics ? Here is for having fun about it

Share this community: [!linguistics_humor@sh.itjust.works](/c/linguistics_humor@sh.itjust.works)

Serious Linguistics community: !linguistics@mander.xyz

Rules:

1- Stay on Topic
Not about Linguistics, language, ways of communications
2- No Racism/Violence
3- No Public Shaming
Shaming someone that could be identifiable/recognizable
4- Avoid spam and duplicates

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Jakylla@sh.itjust.works

lvxferre@mander.xyz

씨발 allophones (lemm.ee)

submitted 2 months ago by TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee to c/linguistics_humor@sh.itjust.works

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

살 and 쌀 are the same word

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think you understand what I mean but something about how I wrote it confused you. Would it make more sense if instead of "language" I said "native language"?

Yes, both ㅅ and ㅆ occur in English, that's why some English words are represented by one consonant or the other when written in Hangul. Yes, they are allophones in English. Yes, they are NOT allophones in Korean. And, yep! This meme is about how an L1 English speaker struggles to distinguish the two consonants when speaking Korean.

Does that make sense? I'm not sure which part suggested that they would be allophones in Korean - I guess I assumed too much context >_< The reason it's so damn hard to learn the difference is partially because the 살/쌀 dichotomy isn't as well-known to non-natives, I guess.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

I think that the big key here is to highlight that allophones are language-dependent, like you're doing in this comment already. And yes, the meme does make sense now!