this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
2252 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59588 readers
4656 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 47 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Does this make containers unnecessary? Or basically built in?

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

A lot different. Containers act as a separate instance of Firefox. So any sites you visit within a container can see each other as if you were using a browser normally. The containers can't see the stuff from other containers though. So you have to actively switch containers all the time to make it work right.

This keeps cookies locked to each page that needs cookies. So a lot stronger.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

So what you’re saying is, each site gets its own container?

[–] PeachMan@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I think there's some confusion here. You're talking about Multi-Account Containers, that person was talking about the Facebook Container. Both Firefox features with confusingly similar names, and honestly that's on Firefox for naming them.

Facebook Container is similar to this TCP feature, but focused on Facebook. And of course it was a separate extension, so very opt-in. Now, Firefox has rolled it out for ALL sites by default, which is awesome and SHOULD HAVE BEEN HOW COOKIES WORKED IN THE FIRST PLACE!

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Isn't there just a non-extension container feature, I can't tell what's the difference between that one and multi-account containers.

[–] Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah this basically sounds like it takes the temporary container add on that I think was folded into Firefox at some point recently and basically just does it behind the scenes now on a per domain basis

Containers also handle other cached content besides cookies.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

It is making the tracking protection part of containers obsolete, this is basically that functionality but built in and default. The containers still let you have multiple cookie jars for the same site, so they are still useful if you have multiple accounts on a site.

[–] MediaSensationalism@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

FREEEDOOOOOOOOOOOM