this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
39 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7206 readers
339 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Universities

💵 Finance / Shopping

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social and Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
39
Canada’s Wildfires Were a Top Global Emitter Last Year, Study Says (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 2 months ago by breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The wildfires that ravaged Canada’s boreal forests in 2023 produced more planet-warming carbon emissions than the burning of fossil fuels in all but three countries, research published on Wednesday has found.

Only China, the United States and India produced more emissions from fossil fuels than the Canadian fires, according to the study, which was published in the journal Nature.

The wildfires last year call into question how much carbon the forests will absorb in the future, scientists said. That, in turn, may make it necessary to reconsider calculations of how much more greenhouse gas humans can add to the atmosphere without pushing temperatures beyond current global targets.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's insane to me that we had all that thick smoke and there were still 3 countries that each polluted more than the sun of that.

I know smoke was much more than just carbon,but the scale was massive and really puts into perspective how much carbon we're extracting and burning.

It's not even close to howuch the US and China emitted.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07878-z/figures/1

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

By their nature you can't out-carbon fossil fuels. You're pitting millions of years of concentrated surface carbon against a few hundreds of years worth.

To capture all the fossil fuel we burn in a year naturally we would have to grow and then log a whole extra earth of forest.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Jesus.

That really illustrates the problem I guess.