this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
421 points (97.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

5837 readers
1500 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aurelius@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Why do we find microplastics in humans but not other common substances (e.g. steel, wool, etc.)? I'm not too familiar with why this is happening

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago

Any foreign objects made up of substance that are non-reactive can end up embedded in our bodies. Most obviously, there are medical devices that might permanently be left there: screws, prosthetics, artificial meshes and valves and membranes, etc. There are also some foreign objects that come from trauma, like shrapnel. Even tattoos are foreign pigments placed in a particular layer of skin that the body doesn't have a mechanism for clearing out.

But generally speaking, if our body doesn't have the enzymes to break down a substance into constituent compounds small enough to transport out, or if that foreign substance sits in a place where our body doesn't have a mechanism to actually get to, it stays in the body.

The reason why we're talking about microplastics, though, is that these compounds might actually be more reactive than previously assumed. If the plastics don't break down at all, then there's no chemical reaction byproducts to worry about. But if they break down very slowly, and the products of those reactions interfere with our biological processes in those tiny quantities, then we have a problem.

[–] PixeIOrange@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Because Steel and Wool degrade into their chemical components by chemical reactions (like oxidation or mold). Plastic wont, it gets smaller and smaller but it stays plastic. So Steel and Wool "skip" being really small, they become other chemicals nature can work with.

(this might be wrong, pls correct if so)

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Specifically steel and wool are manufactured to be what they are. The process probably involves a step to remove micro plastics.

[–] Wasp@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Your reply makes no sense to me.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

It's like that because of the way that it is.

[–] redisdead@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Steel is made by heating up iron and carbon at temperatures where all kinds of plastics would sublimate into gas.

[–] PixeIOrange@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I think he meant the other way, why we humans wont have steel or wool in us