this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
111 points (87.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

19623 readers
92 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Feyter@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
BurningTurtle@programming.dev
pylapp@programming.dev
111
that's not- (kbin.melroy.org)
submitted 3 months ago by Aatube@kbin.melroy.org to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
37 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] key@lemmy.keychat.org 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Plus, the license was only changed on a secondary branch. The default branch still has the MIT license. The text at the top isn't "this is the license file you have open" it's "the repo is licensed under this" so it's correct behavior but bad UX. It would be most user-friendly to show repo license and then also say "this branch has an invalid license, beware shenanigans"

[โ€“] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 3 months ago

I didn't even realize that! Their official distribution page links to the "secondary branch", which is actually an outdated tag branch. The license was changed a month ago.