this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
1758 points (99.4% liked)

People Twitter

5213 readers
2111 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 months ago (3 children)

For hundreds of thousands of years, we spent 2 or 3 hours a day hunting and gathering, then chilled out and had fun the rest of the time. That’s what our bodies are designed for.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago

I was hoping you would say "unnaturally contorted in a desk chair for 8-10 hours per day"

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 months ago

Those numbers are off, and there's some studies showing that what people simplify to "chilling out" was also work, just done in groups back at the settlement. For example, preparing the animal you caught for eating, using the tools of the era, takes time. Unfortunately there are a lot of people understanding only the bare bones cliffnotes of historic life, then using it as fuel for their (justified but somewhat misinformed) campaign against the workload expected of us in modern life.

That said, the general take away is correct: humans used to be far more active in the completion of their daily duties.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Back when we lived to the ripe old age of 38.

(Im kidding, I know that was mostly due to infection and whatnot)

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The 'age of 38' thing isn't even due to infection ir disease, or even a thing at all. 38 was the average between the high number of infant deaths and the normal lifespan of someone who didn't.

Ok, women giving birth skewed it a bit too. Men didn't die in battle as much as people think, since most battles were decided when a small portion of the losing side died and the rest fled.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Do we have numbers for the hunter-gatherer time that can even be skewed by infant deaths?

Edit: as it turns out, yes, absolutely. Wikipedia says the lifespan is around 21-37 years but 57% died before 15 and 64% of those that don't would also reach 45.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, mid twenties to mid thirties tends to be the peak of human health and physcial fitness which would be true no matter what conditions are, so it would make sense that disease, accidents, and other trauma would be far less fatal during those ages.