this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
886 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59042 readers
3069 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

simply because they are going to be abandoned within 1-2 years, are powered by some anaemic chipset that is already multiple generations behind what is already available in my TV stand; and will likely end up as an attack vector to my network some period down the road.

You do realize all of that would probably cease being a problem if people were able to hack their TVs to install custom OS's.

all the spyware bullshit would also be gone with a custom OS.

Literally every one of your gripes would be addressed and fixed by being able to hack your TV

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Custom OS isn’t going to address the anaemic hardware, nor do I think relying on open-source custom ROMs for a niche item is the best way to ensure any hardware-level vulnerabilities are covered.

If you already have an Internet-connected device hooked up to your TV (eg. PlayStation); there is no need to connect another, especially when it provides an overall worse experience.

Shit, a basic HTPC is infinitely better - using a Linux-based distribution (which will have a lot more support vs. a niche TV ROM), and it’ll be supported well beyond what the hardware could handle.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Custom OS isn’t going to address the anaemic hardware, nor do I think relying on open-source custom ROMs for a niche item is the best way to ensure any hardware-level vulnerabilities are covered.

Not only would it give "anemic" hardware new life, I can point at how its already been done at another in home device. Routers. DDWRT/OpenWRT/Tomato do exactly that for old, otherwise useless routers.

Literally every single argument you make can make against it has been proven wrong, and has in other devices, be addressed with a custom OS/Firmware that is designed for purpose without all the bloat and other BS.

You can adamantly say "Nuh uh!" all you want, but it doesnt change the facts.

You can buy PS5s for every TV in your house if you want to, Not everyone has that money, luxury, or stubborn desire.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Good luck implementing all the display color calibration, pixel refresher, anti-burn in features, etc... on these new TV panels. Personally I'd rather keep my warranty and just use a separate device to run the apps.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Okay, you buy a new TV every year just to have a warranty.

Most people dont have that luxury.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 1 points 2 months ago

I'm upgrading from no TV, and I expect it to last me at least 10 years or I'll be very disappointed.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

That anemic device uses hardware decoding in order to be able to decode the video data fast enough - it is literally unable to handle newer video encodings fast enough because it would have to do software decoding, which is were the anemic part totally kills it.

Routers on the other hand have been entirely done in software for ages (with at most hardware support for the encryption in things like SSL, which hasn't changed in decades) and don't have to reliably process 4k of data within 20 ms (for 50Hz) time frames.

Your example is very much an apples and oranges comparison.